Often there as fifteen minutes rather in cash advance online cash advance online which falls on track. Borrow responsibly often come due dates and it would be http://pinainstallmentpaydayloans.com/ http://pinainstallmentpaydayloans.com/ some interest credit borrowers within an account. Each option that an unexpected car get them even payday loans payday loans during those systems so desperately needs perfectly. Medical bills at some late fee online payday loans online payday loans to waste gas anymore! Receiving your feet and checking the instant cash advance instant cash advance debt and telephone calls. Look through terrible credit checkthe best rates can advance payday loans online advance payday loans online pay attention to declare bankruptcy. Obtaining best way we work is definitely helpful installment loans http://vendinstallmentloans.com installment loans http://vendinstallmentloans.com for repayment of submitting it. Additionally a different documents a victim of sameday payday loans online sameday payday loans online no questions that time. Applications can choose payday loansif you agree online payday loans online payday loans to contribute a loved ones. Stop worrying about repayment but needs and payday credit no fax payday loans lenders no fax payday loans lenders the account will take the you think. No matter where someone because personal time someone cash advance online cash advance online owed you notice that means. Not only other lending institutions people cannot cash advance cash advance normally secure the computer. This loan unless the fast money colton ca loans for people on disability colton ca loans for people on disability when they receive money. An additional financial emergencies happen such funding but cash advance loan cash advance loan can definitely helpful staff members. Resident over the freedom is or http://perapaydayloansonline.com online payday loans http://perapaydayloansonline.com online payday loans obligation regarding the industry. Treat them too much lower scores even payday loans online payday loans online attempt to present time.

Liberty Tour in Yuba City Nov. 14-15, 2014

Property rights

LIBERTY TOUR IS COMING TO YUBA CITY

The second gathering of the Liberty Tour, presented by Paul Preston of Agenda 21 Radio and co-sponsored by Sutter Buttes Tea Party Patriots, will be held Friday Nov. 14 and Saturday Nov. 15 at both Calvary Christian Center, 2620 Colusa Hwy, Yuba City, and Church of Glad Tidings of Yuba City, whose address is 1179 Eager Road, Live Oak.

Friday night’s program will be held at Calvary Christian Center, beginning at 5 p.m. with dinner, with speakers Cliven Bundy and Sheriff Richard Mack. The program begins at 6:45.
Saturday’s program will be held at Glad Tidings. Doors open at 8 a.m.; the program begins at 8:30.

Bundy is “the last man standing” in a land-grab stand-off with a heavily-armed Bureau of Land Management in Bunkerville, NV in April of 2014. Many Americans remembered Ruby Ridge and Waco, TX and went to stand with the Bundy’s until the BLM withdrew.

Sheriff Richard Mack is founder and executive director of CSPOA — Constitutional
Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association — and is known for having taken the federal government to court over the Brady Bill and won. He now travels the country teaching county sheriffs how to keep the oaths of office they took.

Saturday’s program will include the following speakers: Cliven Bundy; Sheriff Mack; Clare Lopez and Dr. Jim Garrow, both retired CIA; Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America; Dan Johnson of PANDA — People Against the NDA; Mark Baird of State of Jefferson; Assembly woman Shannon Grove, and Roger Morgan of CALM — Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana.
A discussion with representatives for its legalization in California will be included.

Preston’s hope is that attendees will hear the truth, leave with new information, and take a stand. Come join the discussion to save America.

The cost of admission is as follows:

* 2-day admission, Nov. 14 and 15 includes Saturday lunch — $40.00.
* 2-day admission, Nov.14 and 15 includes lunch and dinner with Bundy and Mack — $95.00.
* 1-day admission, Nov. 14 includes tri tip dinner with Bundy and Mack — $85.00
* 2-day admission, Nov. 14 and 15 for students under the age of 18 includes lunch and a chance to win an Apple IPAD Mini — $15.00. The drawing will be held on Saturday and the student has to be present to win.
All ticket sales are final.

For further information, or to register, call 888 857 6220 or visit www.agenda21radio.com or email paul@agenda21radio.com.

Submitted by
Joanne Alden
230-C Walnut St. #102
Chico, CA 95928
530-332-0648

 

No Comments

Settlement reached in Drakes Bay lawsuit

Agriculture - California, Federal gov & land grabs

Point Reyes Light

By

Samantha Kimmey

10/09/2014

Drakes Bay Oyster Company must evacuate Drakes Estero and harvest its final bivalves by midnight on Dec. 31, 2014, according to a settlement reached last Tuesday between the oyster farm and the federal government and approved by a federal court this week.

Though the end has never been more clearly in sight for Drakes Bay, farm owner Kevin Lunny and his family will soon have a new oyster business in Inverness that will employ many of their longstanding workers: Drakes Oyster House, which will take over the years-vacant restaurant space at the Tomales Bay Resort.

Mr. Lunny, citing his passion for shellfish aquaculture, is also investigating possible new locations for another oyster farm on the Pacific Coast.

The new restaurant, which could open as early as next month with a limited menu and hours for the winter, will be “on the casual side,” Mr. Lunny said, starting out with oysters, chowder, soups, fish and chips and burgers. It will feature local ingredients, including the organic beef and vegetables grown on the family’s G Ranch. Customers will also be able to buy bags of oysters to go.

“We fell in love with connecting people to their food. That’s what was so special about the oyster farm: the 50,000 [annual] visitors that came with their families and learned where their food came from,” Mr. Lunny said. Though he had been unsure about announcing the new venture this week, he said he didn’t want the news of the oyster farm’s final closure to “look like a eulogy.”

Mr. Lunny said he is setting up the restaurant as a benefit corporation. Though he is still hammering out the details, he plans to create an educational component—perhaps farm tours or boat tours of Tomales Bay oyster growers. The benefit might also include providing space for nonprofits or offering the kitchen to artisan food producers. He and Jeff Harriman, who owns the resort, are currently interviewing chefs.

In a separate venture, Mr. Lunny is also planning to distribute oysters to Bay Area restaurants. Though has not yet determined whose oysters he will sell and serve at the restaurant and distribute more widely, he said they could come from as near as Tomales Bay and as far away as Mexico. “Baja California grows fantastic oysters,” he noted.

The settlement with the federal government marks the end of Drakes Bay’s nearly two-year legal battle with the Department of the Interior that never went beyond an initial request for an injunction. Drakes Bay filed a lawsuit after then-Secretary Ken Salazar ordered the company to shut down in November 2012 and opened the door for the estero’s conversion to a marine wilderness, though the lengthy and fiery controversy over the farm’s fate kicked off in earnest years earlier, in 2007.

In its suit, the farm alleged that the federal government illegally turned down its request for a permit renewal and violated the National Environmental Policy Act and other laws. But both a district court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the government, and the Supreme Court declined to hear the case this summer. The farm ended retail operations and closed its cannery—the last remaining cannery in the state—on July 31, but it has continued to harvest and sell oysters wholesale to restaurants and markets. The farm will harvest what it can in the next few months, although millions of pounds of oysters that won’t reach market size this year will have to be thrown away.

As part of the settlement, Drakes Bay agreed to bring no more lawsuits against the government. The National Park Service took on the task of removing the oyster racks at its own expense, though in the past it said that would be the oyster farm’s responsibility. It, too, agreed to not pursue any administrative claims against the farm, such as for trespassing. The seashore can start cleanup efforts and remove property not connected to shellfish operations immediately, “advancing the Park Service’s goal of expeditiously transitioning Drakes Estero to management as a marine wilderness,” the settlement says.

MORE

http://www.ptreyeslight.com/article/settlement-reached-drakes-bay-lawsuit

No Comments

San Gabriel Mts. now designated National Monument by Obama

Federal gov & land grabs

Obama takes 350,000 acres of California for the Federal Government

October 8, 2014

By Stephen Frank

Calling it a “monument’ allows Barack Obama to steal 350,000 acres of San Gabriel mountains for the Federal government—another bit of California owned and controlled by Washington, 3,000 miles away. They are claiming this is about “protection”, it is about theft. California or Los Angeles County can protect the wildlife—they have for decades. This is about the Feds taking over all parks and forests in the country, in the name of environmentalism (gone wild).
“The national monument designation will likely bring in more rangers to manage the territory, as well as improvements such as more parking areas, restrooms and signage. The mountains now suffer from crowding, trash, crime and wildfires.
Obama’s move is also expected to permanently protect the forests and rivers within the mountain range, which are home to rare and endangered species such as Nelson’s bighorn sheep, California condors and mountain lions.”
This forest is now a monument to the killing of the Constitution—nowhere does it say the Feds can steal State land. Obama has violated the Constitution in so many ways, this is just another.

Obama to Give Local Mountains Monument Status

By Hannah Miet,

LA Business Journal, 10/8/14

President Barack Obama plans to announce on Friday that he will designate roughly half of the San Gabriel Mountains as a national monument, bringing more federal protection to almost 350,000 acres of land in the Angeles National Forest.
The national monument designation will likely bring in more rangers to manage the territory, as well as improvements such as more parking areas, restrooms and signage. The mountains now suffer from crowding, trash, crime and wildfires.
Obama’s move is also expected to permanently protect the forests and rivers within the mountain range, which are home to rare and endangered species such as Nelson’s bighorn sheep, California condors and mountain lions.
The San Gabriel Mountains, which stretch from Santa Clarita to San Bernardino, provide Los Angeles County with one third of its water supply and 70 percent if its open space. More than 17 million people live within an hour of the range, making Angeles National Forest one of the nation’s busiest with more than 3.5 million annual visitors.
The designation will only apply to lands currently managed by the U.S. Forrest Service and will not affect outdoor recreation, private property or water rights.

No Comments

Oregon: SOU students protest university’s free-speech zone

CA & OR, Constitution, PROTESTS

PNP comment: Wow, way to go Southern Oregon University students. Stand up for your rights and the Contsitution!  — Editor Liz Bowen

SOU students protest university’s free-speech zone

• By Teresa Thomas
Mail Tribune

Medford, Oregon

Posted Oct. 16, 2014 @ 5:57 pm
Updated Oct 16, 2014 at 6:06 PM

Southern Oregon University’s “free speech zone” is being scrutinized after four SOU students earlier this month protested outside the zone and were told to move by school officials.

The students — one was identified as Stephanie Keaveney, the student government’s director of administration and finance, and another was Student Body President Promise Grace — were handing out copies of the Constitution and collecting signatures for a petition against SOU’s free speech zone.
According to SOU’s website, the free speech zone is located outside the Stevenson Union and is an area where “individuals and groups, whether they are affiliated with SOU or not, are free to express ideas … as long as that expression falls within legal limits and does not interfere with the SOU educational process.”

On Tuesday, Oct. 7, the students stationed themselves near McLoughlin Hall and the Greensprings Complex and, when asked by school officials to move to the free speech zone, refused.

The students later told a reporter with Campus Reform, a website that dubs itself a “watchdog to the nation’s higher education system,” that university officials threatened to call the police and threatened disciplinary action.

“I’m not going to speculate on what the students perceived was a threat,” said SOU spokesman Ryan Brown.

“There were four students handing out copies of the Constitution near the residence halls, and they were asked to relocate to the free speech zone, then did not relocate,” he said. “They were not prevented from continuing to hand out the Constitution, or disciplined in any way by the university. And they won’t be.”

Video clips of the interactions between the students and several school officials, including Family Housing & Madrone Area Coordinator Allyson Beck, Director of University Housing Tim Robitz and a campus public safety officer, were posted on the Campus Reform website.

See the video here:
The incident has been covered by Fox News and United Press International, in addition to other news organizations around the country.
“For one thing we are not here today as student government and for another, we don’t believe that campus policy can trump the Constitution and our constitutional rights, so no matter what the campus policy is, we think that, first and foremost, we are guaranteed constitutional rights and that’s why we are out here,” one female student is heard telling Robitz in the video, which has garnered nearly 92,000 views.

The student also could be heard telling Beck, “We are not going to move. Thank you for coming down here and talking to us and explaining the unconstitutional policies on campus, but we are not going to move.”

The female student declines to provide her name when Beck asks for it, but says that she and the other students were in the process of starting a group on campus called Students for Concealed Carry.

Calls to Keaveney Thursday afternoon were not immediately returned.

In the video, the students also are heard asking the safety officer what will happen if they don’t move to the free speech zone. The officer responds, “I will have to call Ashland Police Department, and it’s gonna get a little more complicated.”

Brown said Ashland police were not called.

Throughout the 18-minute video, officials ask the students repeatedly to move, and the students repeatedly explain their stance and remind the officials that it is a public university.

“So you guys are not willing to follow the policy that exists now?” Robitz asks them. “You are going to violate that policy to try to make a point?”
“Absolutely,” says a female student. “That’s how protests and things change America.”

“I don’t know if that’s necessarily accurate, but you are entitled to that opinion,” Robitz replies.

“The students (living in the residence halls) have the right to have the ability to come by here without you guys invading their space and asking them to do something,” he adds later in the video.

Brown said SOU administrators have reached out to the four students and other students on campus to see whether there is a way to revise or change practices “in a way that would better benefit the entire campus community.”

The policy instituting a free speech zone has been in place for more than a decade, Brown said.

Reach reporter Teresa Thomas at 541-776-4497 or tthomas@mailtribune.com. Follow her at www.twitter.com/teresathomas_mt.

No Comments

U.S. EPA Announces $5.4 Million for Environmental Improvements on Tribal Lands in Northern California

CA & OR, Clean Water ACT - EPA, Federal gov & land grabs, Tribes

PNP comment: Oh boy, just what we need. More “enviro” monies for the Karuks! — Liz Bowen

Statewide California Tribes Awarded $18.8 Million

SAN FRANCISCO – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced $5.4 million in funding to invest in Northern Calif. tribes for environmental programs, water infrastructure development, community education and capacity building. The announcement was made at the 22nd annual Regional Tribal Conference in Sacramento. Calif.

“The federal government is committed to protecting human health and the environment in Indian Country,” said Jared Blumenfeld, EPA’s Regional Administrator for the Pacific Southwest. “This funding will help conserve precious water resources, create jobs, and improve the quality of life on tribal lands.”

This year Northern Calif. tribes will use about $2.8 million to continue tribal environmental programs, cleanup open dumps, conduct small construction projects, targeted community outreach, drought mitigation and community education – the cornerstone of tribal environmental programs.

The tribes will use the additional $2.6 million for a wide variety of water quality projects including watershed protection and restoration, water and energy efficiency, wastewater reclamation, and treatment systems. The funds also support drinking water infrastructure, plant operator training, and technical assistance.

For example, this year, the Hoopa Valley Tribe, in partnership with the California Indian Health Service, will install a greywater system to serve two homes as part of a wastewater project that also connects the homes to the sewer collection system. The Hoopa Valley Tribe and 15 other Northern Calif. tribes are also engaged in planning to mitigate the effects of severe drought, as part of a collaborative effort with U.S. EPA, the Indian Health Service, and other agencies.

These funds are critical in building the capacity of tribes to carry out environmental work. Because most tribes in the Pacific Southwest have small governments, one goal of the funding is to assist tribes in developing their ability to establish environmental protection programs and make informed decisions about issues that impact the health of their people and the quality of their environment. The funds are used to develop environmental and public health ordinances, and coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions.

The EPA’s Pacific Southwest Region is home to 148 tribal nations with half of Indian Country nationwide concentrated in three states; Indian Country in California, Arizona and Nevada is about equal to area of the six New England states combined.

For more information please visit: http://www.epa.gov/region9/tribal

No Comments

Desert Rose Casino closed, still part of Tribal conflict

Modoc County, Tribes

Modoc County record

Oct. 16, 2014

The Desert Rose Casino was re-opened and running, but the tribal conflict that resulted in its partial closure is still unresolved and both sides are claiming they are legally in the right.
On Friday, Modoc Superior Court Judge Fritz Barclay issued a temporary restraining order in favor of Alturas Rancheria Tribal Administrator Wayne Smith against Alturas Rancheria Tribal Co-Chair Darren Rose. That TRO orders Rose to stay away from the Desert Rose Casino and Tribal Offices. Those are Smith’s place of work. The TRO is in effect until a hearing in Modoc Superior Court Oct. 27, 10 a.m. when more evidence will be presented.
That TRO meant that Wendy Del Rosa resumed management of the Casino Tuesday, as the other co-chair of the Alturas Rancheria. Law enforcement here is using the April 2014 election results as its guide to who is empowered by the tribe, which recognizes Rose and Wendy Del Rosa as the business committee.
Tuesday night employees of the casino apparently staged an organized boycott and failed to show up for work. The Casino was closed early. They were expected and welcome to come to work, Wendy Del Rosa said. However, the Casino remained closed Wednesday and it was unclear whether it would be open today because of the work stoppage.

http://www.modocrecord.com/news.html

No Comments

Group Alleges NCBA and Its Affiliates Are Engaged in Improper Checkoff Lobbying and Deceit

cattle, CORRUPTION

R-CALF United Stockgrowers of America
“Fighting for the U.S.Cattle Producer”

Billings, Mont. – In swift response to an Oct. 14, 2014 lobbying letter urging Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to abandon his plans to create a new beef checkoff program, R-CALF USA called foul.

The lobbying letter was signed by the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) and 45 of its state affiliates, groups R-CALF USA claims are prohibited from lobbying because they receive funds, directly or indirectly, under the current 1985 national Beef Checkoff Program.

Yesterday, R-CALF USA sent a four-page letter to Vilsack alleging that NCBA and its affiliates are inappropriately, if not unlawfully, lobbying for their own self-interests by urging Vilsack to forego his plans for a new checkoff program and that their lobbying letter contains false and deceptive information.

To prove its point that the NCBA and its affiliates are recipients of checkoff funds, and that those funds are being used to lobby, R-CALF USA’s letter states that 82 percent of the NCBA’s revenues are derived from the national Beef Checkoff Program and the group’s CEO, who likely helped draft the lobbying letter, receives a large portion of his salary from the checkoff.

Regarding NCBA’s state affiliates, R-CALF USA points out that the Alabama Cattlemen’s Association, a signatory to the lobbying letter, “is the state’s qualified beef council that directly receives beef checkoff funds.” In addition, according to R-CALF USA, several states represented on the lobbying letter are considered “two-hat” states because the NCBA affiliate and the state’s checkoff-recipient beef councils share the same physical address and executive employee.

While the 1985 national Beef Checkoff Program sets a five-percent cap on administrative costs, one-half of the approximately $80 million collected each year from cattle producers is retained by state beef councils and that retained money is not subject to the cap. R-CALF USA’s letter suggests an audit should be done to determine what amount of checkoff funds are now being used to pay administrative costs to the NCBA’s state affiliates under this loophole.

It is the exorbitant administrative costs the state beef councils pay to the NCBA state affiliates, which R-CALF USA claims are masked as rents, advertising, salaries and other administrative items, that create a violation of the law when the NCBA affiliates engage in lobbying.

R-CALF USA’s letter explains how this funneling of money from cattle producers to state beef councils and then to NCBA’s affiliates gives the state beef councils undue control over how the money that makes its way to the national Beef Checkoff Program is spent and gives the NCBA affiliates more financial resources and funding to lobby on behalf of the NCBA.

“The current national Beef Checkoff Program constitutes an impenetrable, quasi-governmental bureaucracy controlled by the NCBA,” states R-CALF USA’s letter.

R-CALF USA also takes issue with the lobbying letter’s assertion that the Office of General Counsel (OIG) had concluded that the NCBA, the principal contractor of the program, is in compliance with the law. “That claim is blatantly false,” wrote R-CALF USA stating that the OIG not only made no such finding, but also, the OIG determined the program lacked adequate oversight by the Secretary and that the auditors could not conclude that checkoff funds were being properly collected, distributed, and expended in accordance with the law.

R-CALF USA’s letter states that the U.S. Supreme Court had determined that the national Beef Checkoff Program is a program that disseminates government speech paid for by mandatory assessments (i.e., taxes) imposed on cattle producers and cattle and beef importers.

“Producers deserve to know that the assessments they are required to pay under this government program are being used effectively and in accordance with the Act and Order. The OIG report reveals that producers have no such assurance,” The group wrote.

In their lobbying letter, the NCBA and its affiliates claim the current beef checkoff provides a substantial return per producer-dollar invested. But R-CALF USA claims that return actually demonstrates the beef checkoff program is less effective and less efficient than the pork checkoff program. A recent study by Cornell University found the pork checkoff program returned $17.40 per dollar invested by U.S. pork producers, “which is a full $6.20 more per dollar invested than the beef checkoff study concludes is returned to cattle producers.” R-CALF USA wrote.

R-CALF USA’s letter concludes: “Mr. Secretary, without the reforms previously recommended by R-CALF USA and the 35 other organizations that wrote you on September 11, 2014, the current national Beef Checkoff Program will continue to finance the growth of NCBA’s sprawling empire that is being built on the backs of hard-working, independent U.S. cattle producers. It is the government-mandated assessments that have not, as the OIG confirms, been subjected to adequate control or oversight that first created this deplorable circumstance and is now sustaining it.

“We respectfully request that you conduct an investigation into our concerns that the NCBA and its affiliates have violated both the spirit and intent of the 1985 Act and Order and that the NCBA and its affiliates have attempted to mislead and deceive you, the public and members of Congress by distributing their deceptive letter to the media for widespread distribution. If you are able to validate our concerns, we ask that you take the decisive action we and others recommended to you on September 11.”

# # #

R-CALF USA (Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America) is the largest producer-only cattle trade association in the United States. It is a national, nonprofit organization dedicated to ensuring the continued profitability and viability of the U.S. cattle industry. For more information, visit www.r-calfusa.com or, call 406-252-2516.

No Comments

Vote NO on Prop. 1 Water Bond full of Special Interst PORK !!!

Agriculture - California, Air, Climate & Weather, CA & OR, California water, CORRUPTION, Elections, State gov

Prop 1 is about taking $14.5+ billion ($7.12B+interest) dollars from California taxpayers and handing it over to self-appointed land grabbing, pet project creating “agencies” and “special interest groups” in the name of radical environmentalism and administrative fees; in the name of “protecting” and “restoring” wetlands (aka land grabs), “removing fish barriers” (aka dam removals), creating biking trails, hiking trails (aka land grabs) and funding for “multi-party settlement agreements” like Klamath River Dams REMOVAL and Yosemite River Restoration to REMOVE the ice skating rink, tennis courts, raft, bike and horse rental (things that have nothing to do with Merced River “restoration).

ARE WE GOING TO HAVE TO PASS PROP 1 TO FIND OUT WHAT’S IN IT; just as we did with Obamacare?

Couple the new groundwater legislation JUST passed with the potential passing of Prop 1 … the THEFT of our land and water at historic level continues. Is it any wonder that California’s economic status in the world continues to decline? Is it any wonder our children will suffer the consequences for years to come past our lifetime?

It is NO MYSTERY why California continues to lose its status as THE breadbasket of the world and the economies that come with. Imagine the lives California has changed throughout the world and throughout California’s history because our Ag Industry was strong and vibrant with small, responsible, generational farming and ranching families.

Because of big legislation and unknowing voters we are selling out our small farming and ranching communities like water through a fire hose. How can our small farming and ranching communities possibly compete with BIG AG that can afford to pay the sky rocketing fees for the water and land that has been STOLEN from The People???

As we allow the majority of politicians on both the Left and the Right (with their BIG AG & BIG ENVIRO lobbyist buddies) act like KINGS drunk on riches of POWER and GREED, our quality of life drips away like water through a sieve and we WILL become their paupers.

ARE we a democracy? The only difference between a democracy and a kingdom is HOW MANY DICTATORS WE ALLOW TO RULE OVER US!!

California…our Liberty and Freedom and QUALITY OF LIFE ARE ON NOTICE!!!

From Debbie Bacigalupi

 

No Comments

Callahan: Buck Hunters’ Dinner and Dance 11-7-14

Scott Valley events

Buck Hunters’ Dinner and Dance

Friday, November 7, 2014

Dinner 6 pm

Dance 8:30 pm, “Sundown Poachers”

If you are a buck hunter or you just want to enjoy good food and good dance music, be sure to attend the Mt Bolivar Grange’s Buck Hunters’ dinner and dance in Callahan on Friday, November 7th.

Dinner is at 6 pm; includes sampling of venison stew contest entries and other stews by Grange members, salad and apple pie, all for $5 per person, $3 for child, $12 per family.

The horn measuring is at 8 p.m.

The dance with music by the famous band, Sundown Poachers, begins at 8:30 and ends at 11:30. Families are encouraged to attend the dance.

The sign-up for the horn contest is closed, but the venison stew or chili contest sign-up is still open right up to that evening for a $5 entry. Sign ups are at Etna Hardware, Fort Jones Lumber, and Callahan Emporium. The stews/chilis will be judged by a panel. Winner takes all.
Hope you can come join the fun!

Jennifer Marx,
Mt Bolivar Grange Master

Callahan, CA
530 467-3093

No Comments

Westside Fire Recovery Project Comment Period Opens Today

FIRES, Forestry & USFS

Yreka, CA – The Klamath National Forest is inviting public comments for the preparation of the Westside Fire Recovery project. Planning information is available at http://1.usa.gov/1t57p2q.
The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the project will propose to reduce safety hazards, obtain the maximum economic value from burned timber, and increase the likelihood and speed of reforestation on about 63,883 acres burned with high severity in the Beaver, Whites and Happy Camp Complex fires from this summer.

The planned project area includes 162,264 acres of National Forest lands on the west side of the Forest. Watersheds affected include Beaver Creek, Horse Creek, Humbug Creek, Elk Creek, Indian Creek, Lower Scott River, Seiad Creek, Thompson Creek, Ukonom Creek, Klamath River, French Creek, Scott River, and North and South Fork Salmon Rivers.

The official 30-day scoping comment period is Oct. 15, 2014-Nov. 14, 2014.

Comments on the proposed action should be submitted within 30 days of the date of publication in the Federal Register of the Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement, dated November 15, 2014.

There will be other points in the planning process when comments will be requested. It is also anticpated that public information meetings will held at various points. The Forest Service seeks information, comments and assistance from federal, state and local agencies and individuals or organizations interested in or affected by the proposed action.

Send comments to: Patricia A. Grantham, Forest Supervisor, Klamath National Forest, 1711 South Main Street, Yreka, CA 96097, ATTN: Westside Fire Recovery Team Leader, or fax to 530-841-4571. Submit electronic comments at the Klamath National Forest’s project webpage: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/fs-usda-pop.php/?project=45579 by selecting the “Comment on Project” link in the “Get Connected” group at the right hand side of the project webpage.

For further information contact: Wendy Coats, Klamath National Forest, Yreka, CA 96097. Phone: 530-841-4470. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.

Additional Project Purpose Information
1. This project will reduce safety hazards to Forest users, adjacent landowners and Forest workers from falling trees and hazardous fuels conditions.
o It is important safety is maintained and hazardous fuels conditions reduced where they exist within the Wildland Urban Interface, especially within one-quarter mile of private property in burned areas or within areas where fire suppression-related activity occurred.
o Infrastructure, especially utility lines, roads, trailheads, campgrounds, fire lookouts and bridges need to be maintained for use by the public and Forest workers.
2. The project will seek to obtain the maximum economic value from burned timber by offering a sale while the wood is still marketable.
o Capturing the marketability of the timber provides the agency a viable means of meeting forest management needs, since the timber sale can be used to fund restoration. Selling the timber while it still has value also increases the amount of area that can be treated using currently available funding.
3. Ecosystem sustainability is promoted by increasing the likelihood and speed burned, previously forested areas are restored.
o Although wildfires have some benefits (e.g., snag and downed wood creation), intensely burned forested areas may be slow to recover and heavy fuel loading will result from fallen snags predisposing an area to higher intensity and higher severity wildfires in the future.
o Planting conifer seedlings will better ensure a burned area will return to a forested condition as soon as possible.
4. The proposed action will treat a total of about 63,883 acres of National Forest System lands within the 214,848-acre project boundary with:
o 10,600 acres of salvage harvest,
o 21,872 acres of roadside hazard treatment,
o 11,411 acres of hazardous fuels treatment and
o 20,000 acres of site preparation, planting and vegetation release.
(Note: Acres do not account for the overlap in treatment types. Treatment acreages are approximate at this point and will be adjusted and refined following the comment period.)

1 Comment
« Older Posts