Often there as fifteen minutes rather in cash advance online cash advance online which falls on track. Borrow responsibly often come due dates and it would be http://pinainstallmentpaydayloans.com/ http://pinainstallmentpaydayloans.com/ some interest credit borrowers within an account. Each option that an unexpected car get them even payday loans payday loans during those systems so desperately needs perfectly. Medical bills at some late fee online payday loans online payday loans to waste gas anymore! Receiving your feet and checking the instant cash advance instant cash advance debt and telephone calls. Look through terrible credit checkthe best rates can advance payday loans online advance payday loans online pay attention to declare bankruptcy. Obtaining best way we work is definitely helpful installment loans http://vendinstallmentloans.com installment loans http://vendinstallmentloans.com for repayment of submitting it. Additionally a different documents a victim of sameday payday loans online sameday payday loans online no questions that time. Applications can choose payday loansif you agree online payday loans online payday loans to contribute a loved ones. Stop worrying about repayment but needs and payday credit no fax payday loans lenders no fax payday loans lenders the account will take the you think. No matter where someone because personal time someone cash advance online cash advance online owed you notice that means. Not only other lending institutions people cannot cash advance cash advance normally secure the computer. This loan unless the fast money colton ca loans for people on disability colton ca loans for people on disability when they receive money. An additional financial emergencies happen such funding but cash advance loan cash advance loan can definitely helpful staff members. Resident over the freedom is or http://perapaydayloansonline.com online payday loans http://perapaydayloansonline.com online payday loans obligation regarding the industry. Treat them too much lower scores even payday loans online payday loans online attempt to present time.

Browsing the archives for the LAWS or law category.

Senator Ted Gaines sends letter asking Brown to declare state of emergency in Siskiyou

CRIMINAL, LAWS or law, Marijuana, Sheriff Jon Lopey, Siskiyou County, State gov, Ted Gaines

Siskiyou Daily News

No Comments

POT growers arrested for allegedly trying to bribe Siskiyou Co. Sheriff Jon Lopey

CRIMINAL, Federal gov & land grabs, LAWS or law, Marijuana, Sheriff Jon Lopey

PNP comment: Just you watch — Siskiyou County will be called ‘racist’ from this situation. BUT, let everyone know that Siskiyou County ELECTED the 1st BLACK SHERIFF in the State of California in 1986 — OVER 30 YEARS AGO — Charlie Byrd, who was re-elected 3 more times! — Editor Liz Bowen


08/31/2017 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 09/01/2017 06:39

Alleged Marijuana Growers In Siskiyou County Charged For Conspiring To Bribe Sheriff

SACRAMENTO, Calif. – Chi Meng Yang, 31, of Montague, and his sister Gaosheng Laitinen, 36, of Mt. Shasta Vista, were charged today for conspiring to commit bribery, bribery of a public official, conspiracy to manufacture marijuana, and manufacturing marijuana, U.S. Attorney Phillip A. Talbert announced.

According to the criminal complaint, on May 17, 2017, Yang met with Siskiyou County Sheriff Jon Lopey in Yreka. During the meeting, Yang offered $1 million to the Sheriff in exchange for his assistance with an interstate marijuana distribution business that Yang and others were in the process of organizing.

Yang explained his role to be that of a representative for several families, himself included, that were currently cultivating marijuana in Siskiyou County. After the meeting, the Sheriff immediately reported it to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration. Federal agents asked the Sheriff to continue meeting with Yang.

At the request of, and in conjunction with the FBI and DEA, the Sheriff contacted Yang and indicated a willingness to work with him and the marijuana growers he represented. The subsequent meetings were audio and video recorded by the FBI. Laitinen attended some of those meetings. During those meetings, Yang and Laitinen talked with the Sheriff about how he could assist them.

Because Yang’s offer of $1 million was contingent on Yang securing and profiting from certain out-of-state marijuana licenses, Yang and Laitinen promised to pay the Sheriff a total of $80,000 if he would exempt eight properties from the Siskiyou County ban against outdoor marijuana grows. They sought protection from raids or other law enforcement actions on these eight properties where outdoor marijuana was being grown.

In furtherance of this plan, Yang and Laitinen gave the Sheriff several initial payments, totaling $10,500 in cash. These funds were immediately turned over to the FBI as evidence.

This case is the product of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the Siskiyou County Sheriff’s Office with assistance from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Forest Service (USFS), North State Marijuana Investigation Team (NSMIT), Tehama Interagency Drug Enforcement (TIDE), Shasta Interagency Narcotics Task Force (SINTF), Siskiyou Unified Major Investigations Team (SUMIT), and California Highway Patrol (CHP). Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael M. Beckwith is prosecuting the case.

Yang was arrested today and is scheduled to make an initial court appearance on September 1, 2017, in Sacramento. If convicted of the charges in the complaint, Yang and Laitinen face the following maximum statutory penalties: (1) five years in prison and a $250,000 fine for the conspiracy charge; (2) 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine for the bribery charge; and (3) a minimum of five years and up to 40 years in prison and a $5 million fine for the drug charges. Any sentence, however, would be determined at the discretion of the court after consideration of any applicable statutory factors and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account a number of variables.

The charges are only allegations; the defendants are presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.


No Comments

New articles on the Nevada Bundy trials

Bundy Battle - Nevada, Bureau of Land Management, Constitution, CORRUPTION, Courts, CRIMINAL, Federal gov & land grabs, Hypocrisy, LAWS or law, Liberty

Redoubt.com news has a flurry of new articles regarding sentencing of defendants how Nevada’s Chief U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro is handling the court room. 

Go to:  https://redoubtnews.com/

No Comments

LaVoy Finicum shooting: FBI agent indicted for alleged false statements

Bundy Battle - Nevada, Bureau of Land Management, Constitution, CORRUPTION, Courts, CRIMINAL, LaVoy Finicum, LAWS or law, Lawsuits, Liberty
No Comments

Memorial Event for rancher LaVoy Finicum — Memorial Weekend

Agriculture, Bundy Battle - Nevada, Bureau of Land Management, Constitution, CORRUPTION, Courts, CRIMINAL, Federal gov & land grabs, LaVoy Finicum, LAWS or law, Liberty

Hello Dear Friends,

Thank you for signing our petition for a congressional investigation of the assassination of LaVoy Finicum.

Since LaVoy’s murder, we have worked diligently while suffering through great sorrow and chaos to get ourselves organized to continue his message of the proper role of government. We plan to launch our campaign in July, which is the 6th month anniversary of his murder.

Many have asked how they might help during this difficult time.

First and foremost, we invite everyone to read the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. We cannot pass the heritage of liberty and freedom to the next generation if the principles of the Constitution are not first burning in our hearts. If you do not have a personal copy of the Constitution, you can purchase one on our website for $1.00. Here is the link to our website: www.onecowboystandforfreedom.com 

Next, anyone who might be looking for something more than this much needed daily study, we invite you to participate in our upcoming Rancher Memorial Event, scheduled for Memorial weekend.

This is a virtual event, which is awesome because it does not restrict the event to one location. Everyone can participate in their hometown. All proceeds help to support either the Bundy or Finicum families, depending on who you sponsor. For registering you receive a blue cowboy bandanna and custom belt buckle with either the Bundy brand or Finicum brand depending on who you sponsor. Pictures of the product can be found in the registration link. Rancher Memorial Event Link: https://www.raceentry.com/races/rancher-memorial-run/2016/register

Our hope is that people will use this Rancher Memorial Event to gather, rally, and educate others about this real story of lost freedoms. Please share the link with all your friends who might be interested in participating.

God help us all as we press forward.


The Finicum Family

“The fight for freedom is God’s fight. So when a man stands for freedom he stands with God…” Ezra Taft Benson.

Website in honor of LaVoy Finicum link below —


LaVoy’s daughters sing below link —

Freedom’s Cry

No Comments

State of California flouts its own enviro laws, claims county threatening multi-million-dollar suit

LAWS or law, Lawsuits, State gov

By Matt Fleming, CalWatchdog.com

Sacramento County is threatening to fine Caltrans millions in taxpayer dollars for drilling hundreds of wells over a period of decades in violation of laws aimed at protecting groundwater, records show.

The county set the possible fine at as much as $5.23 million per day to locate and follow proper procedures for a fraction of the wells — the most extreme measure thus far in a long-running jurisdictional spitting contest. The county says the state should have obtained permits, licenses and inspections for 523 narrow wells drilled from January 1990 to May 2014, according to a notice of violation obtained by CalWatchdog.

The wells, four to six inches in diameter, are used to monitor geological conditions and water levels for safe building purposes. State water laws are aimed at making sure the holes, which can extend hundreds of feet into the ground, don’t allow for untreated stormwater or hazardous chemicals to pollute groundwater, which the holes often intersect with.

Caltrans lawyers have for years advised staff that while the agency was subject to the laws, Caltrans could police itself. The agency relied on those opinions in deciding not to obtain the same approval and paperwork from county agencies required of a private individual or company undertaking similar drilling.

Under pressure from county environmental agencies, Caltrans shifted its stance in 2014, announcing its intent to follow the law going forward and outlining a plan to locate wells throughout the state and to work under the proper license.

ensuring that you are in compliance is always a best practice, whether you are an individual or a state department.”

– Mark Dinger, CalTrans spokesman

“Our intention has always been to play by the rules, and ensuring that you are in compliance is always a best practice, whether you are an individual or a state department,” Caltrans spokesman Mark Dinger said.

The dispute with Sacramento County is one of several across the state involving the drilling regulations. The agency has had relatively recent run-ins in Marin, Mendocino, San Joaquin and Humboldt counties. Some of those counties and others have filed records requests on well drilling in their jurisdictions.

The state estimates it drilled 10,000 borings across the state since 1990, though some would not have been subject to the state Water Code at issue.

CalWatchdog asked Dinger why the state agency failed to fully adhere to state and local laws during that time.



In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

No Comments

Another attack on the Bill of Rights

LAWS or law, Liberty

PNP comment: Thanks to our good friend in Idaho, who sent this to us. Pretty sad state of affairs and loss of liberty. The hypocrisy is striking. — Editor Liz Bowen


Idaho city’s ordinance tells pastors to marry gays or go to jail

The Washington Times – Monday, October 20, 2014

Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, city officials have laid down the law to Christian pastors within their community, telling them bluntly via an ordinance that if they refuse to marry homosexuals, they will face jail time and fines.

The dictate comes on the heels of a legal battle with Donald and Evelyn Knapp, ordained ministers who own the Hitching Post wedding chapel in the city, but who oppose gay marriage, The Daily Caller reported.

A federal judge recently ruled that the state’s ban on gay marriage was unconstitutional, while the city of Coeur d’Alene has an ordinance that prevents discrimination based on sexual preference.

The Supreme Court’s recent refusal to take on gay rights’ appeals from five states has opened the doors for same-sex marriages to go forth.

The Knapps were just asked by a gay couple to perform their wedding ceremony, The Daily Caller reported.

“On Friday, a same-sex couple asked to be married by the Knapps, and the Knapps politely declined,” The Daily Signal reported. “The Knapps now face a 180-day jail term and a $1,000 fine for each day they decline to celebrate the same-sex wedding.”

The Alliance Defending Freedom has filed a suit in federal court to stop the city from enforcing the fine and jail sentence, saying in a statement from senior legal counsel Jeremy Tedesco that the government has overstepped its bounds, The Daily Caller reported.

“Many have denied that pastors would ever be forced to perform ceremonies that are completely at odds with their faith, but that’s what is happening here — and it’s happened this quickly,” Mr. Tedersco said, The Daily Caller reported.

But the city sees it differently. As far back as May, city officials were insisting that their ordinance is indeed in line with law.

“If you turn away a gay couple, refuse to provide services for them, then in theory you violated our code, and you’re looking at a potential misdemeanor citation,” said Coeur d’Alene City Attorney Warren Wilson, to KXLY months ago.

© Copyright 2015 The Washington Times, LLC.


In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

No Comments

Report on J-H Guest Ranch expansion from Friends of French Creek

LAWS or law, Siskiyou County

Report from Friends of French Creek on the J-H Guest Ranch expansion discussion at the Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors on 1-20-15

FOFC spoke at the Board of Supervisors this morning to much good effect.

Jeffy Marx spoke eloquently and passionately about needing to ensure that JH, with their big money and lawyers, are held accountable to the rules like all the rest of Siskiyou County citizens and businesses. She warned of the danger of setting a bad precedent. She asked that, when their turn comes, the Board deny JH expansion and insist on enforcement of the 1993 permit levels.

Dan Deppen brought his technical expertise as a licensed surveyor to his comments saying that effective code enforcement is needed and also about JH’s long history of evasion of the law.

Michael Stapleton engaged the Supervisors with his review of the history of comments of Scott Valley residents in 1993 complaining about JH expanding and then trying to get permission afterwords: “Deja Vu”.

Betsy Stapleton spoke about Cal-Fire 4290 requirements and asked the Board to support application of those requirements to JH, as well as supporting the Planning Department’s effort to develop enforceable code provisions.

Additional FOFC members, Molly McGowan, Janeane Deppen, Marc Williams, and Bill Marx attend and showed their support.

Greg Plucker (Director of the Planning Dept.) attended and gave the Board an update on both the expansion application (waiting for all the agencies to weigh in) and enforcement of the 1993 permit. Plucker said that the Planning Department has sent a letter to JH saying that the 1993 permit will be enforced, unless/until the expansion is approved.

The Board meeting started with a prayer that spoke to the continued drought, and Cal-Fire representative Phil (?) was present to hear our comments. Both couldn’t have been more timely.

The code enforcement regulation that would make enforcement of code violations possible will be coming before the Board soon. It will be important to let the Supervisors know that we want an Enforceable Code Now! I’ll let you know when and where. It’ll be kinda fun to go speak in favor of something!

No Comments

Leftist lawmakers and enviro-extremists created CA water crisis

Agenda 21 & Sustainable, Agriculture - California, Air, Climate & Weather, California water, Greenies & grant $, LAWS or law, Over-regulations, Politicians & agencies, Property rights, State gov, Threats to agriculture, Water rights, Water, Resources & Quality

PNP comment: Stephen Frank and Assemblyman Tim Donnelly are right on! — Editor Liz Bowen

Comment by Stephen Frank of California Political News and Views:

Sept. 1, 2014

Let us get real. We have not developed water storage facilities because we did not know we needed them, but because laws and rules passed by the legislature gave the courts the ability to say No to any location. Since the last dams were built California increased by 15 million in population—with no new water sources, plus part of the Colorado River water we received has been reallocated to other States.

Now the State is about to have groundwater—privately owned, controlled by Sacramento. Watch as the creation of new water wells stop and the maintenance of old ones slows down. Water in California, all of it belongs to government.

“These bills, which obliterate private property rights and local control, are being sold as a port in a storm, when the reality is that they are the recipe for the perfect storm. By granting the State Water Resources Control Board, the last vestige of control over all our water, the farmers and ranchers who were denied their allocation of water from the State Water Project, will be at the mercy of a merciless government. The tactics of the left never vary. They use a government created crisis such as the drought, which is the culmination of years of their own mismanagement and corruption, to consolidate power.”

Leftist Lawmakers and Enviro-Extremists Created CA Water Crisis

by Assemblyman Tim Donnelly, Breitbart CA,   8/30/14

On Friday, the California State Assembly outdid itself. You can always count on the leftist leaders of what is supposed to be the “people’s house” never lets a crisis go to waste.

With the passage of AB 1739 (Dickinson-D), SB 1168 (Pavley-D), and SB 1319 (Pavley-D), 100 years of history was reversed. The authors painted a grim picture of California’s groundwater future. Most of what they said is true. The only problem they didn’t bother to tell you two key truths:

1.It was these same so-called leaders who give up our seat—the property owner and the farmer’s place at the table—to the enviro-extremists. The fish now have more water rights than do the farmers and ranchers who by making a living off the land, feed this state and this country.

2.By wasting surface water and letting 800,000 acre-feet go out to sea instead of capturing and storing it for the bad years, California’s dysfunctional policies combined with uber-restrictive Federal endangered species protections have created over-dependency on groundwater.

These bills, which obliterate private property rights and local control, are being sold as a port in a storm, when the reality is that they are the recipe for the perfect storm. By granting the State Water Resources Control Board, the last vestige of control over all our water, the farmers and ranchers who were denied their allocation of water from the State Water Project, will be at the mercy of a merciless government. The tactics of the left never vary. They use a government created crisis such as the drought, which is the culmination of years of their own mismanagement and corruption, to consolidate power.

Now, the basic right of a citizen to draw water for support of himself or his family is non-existent. Once a state agency gets control over something, they are like a great white shark. They never let go. Now a board that sits just a few blocks away from the State Capitol will have more say than your local governing body over how much groundwater you can use. Don’t be fooled by the proponents of this bill who are doing this to “help recharge the groundwater.” There is nothing in this bill that will address the groundwater crisis facing California. Almost every one of the provisions of these bills will not be in force for years to come.

This is about power and government control. Whoever controls the water, controls the people. Every time the government takes more control over a natural resource, the price goes up. In this case, the cost of food and energy will be inflated by government, not the marketplace. When government is the source of inflation, it is only a matter of time until cheaper sources make their way to market from less-regulated states or nations.

California has long been known as the “bread basket of the world.” If Governor Jerry Brown signs into law this evil trifecta, the government that created a dust bowl out of the once-fertile Central Valley, will preside over the death of agriculture as the number one industry in our state.


No Comments

Bill Before Arizona Senate Would Force U.S. to Get Local Sheriff’s Permission To Enforce Federal Law

Constitution, LAWS or law, Sheriffs

Bill Before Arizona Senate Would Force U.S. To Get Local Sheriffs’ Permission To Enforce Federal Law : Personal Liberty™

A bill before the Arizona State Senate would make it a crime for Federal officers to attempt to enforce Federal law in the State without first receiving written permission from the County sheriff where the action is to occur.

According to the Arizona Daily Star, Senate Bill 1290 would require a Federal agent to obtain a county sheriff’s consent before arresting or searching anyone who’s the target of a Federal investigation or apprehension attempt in Arizona. The bill provides exceptions for crimes that are witnessed while in progress, for agents who are State-certified peace officers and for U.S. Customs and the Border Patrol.

Sponsored by Republican State Senator Judy Burges, the bill is intended to ensure elected sheriffs are able, under the law, to protect their constituents if the Federal government attempts an operation that “supersedes” the authority of the sheriff.

Richard Mack, former sheriff of Graham County in the State’s rural southeastern quadrant, argued persuasively for the bill before a Senate panel, according to the Daily Star.

“[W]e allow bureaucrats from Washington, D.C., to come in and supersede his [the sheriff’s] authority, and to do whatever they want in his county, and they can say nothing about it? …We’re asking that the federal government do something they should already be doing: verifying their work and what they’re doing with the sheriff as a check and balance so that atrocities committed in the 1990s especially by the federal government at Ruby Ridge and Waco and other places …This will be normal activity and will continue if we don’t have somebody locally telling the federal government, ‘You can’t do that,’” he said.

No Comments
« Older Posts