Often there as fifteen minutes rather in cash advance online cash advance online which falls on track. Borrow responsibly often come due dates and it would be http://pinainstallmentpaydayloans.com/ http://pinainstallmentpaydayloans.com/ some interest credit borrowers within an account. Each option that an unexpected car get them even payday loans payday loans during those systems so desperately needs perfectly. Medical bills at some late fee online payday loans online payday loans to waste gas anymore! Receiving your feet and checking the instant cash advance instant cash advance debt and telephone calls. Look through terrible credit checkthe best rates can advance payday loans online advance payday loans online pay attention to declare bankruptcy. Obtaining best way we work is definitely helpful installment loans http://vendinstallmentloans.com installment loans http://vendinstallmentloans.com for repayment of submitting it. Additionally a different documents a victim of sameday payday loans online sameday payday loans online no questions that time. Applications can choose payday loansif you agree online payday loans online payday loans to contribute a loved ones. Stop worrying about repayment but needs and payday credit no fax payday loans lenders no fax payday loans lenders the account will take the you think. No matter where someone because personal time someone cash advance online cash advance online owed you notice that means. Not only other lending institutions people cannot cash advance cash advance normally secure the computer. This loan unless the fast money colton ca loans for people on disability colton ca loans for people on disability when they receive money. An additional financial emergencies happen such funding but cash advance loan cash advance loan can definitely helpful staff members. Resident over the freedom is or http://perapaydayloansonline.com online payday loans http://perapaydayloansonline.com online payday loans obligation regarding the industry. Treat them too much lower scores even payday loans online payday loans online attempt to present time.

Browsing the archives for the Media category.

The Ambush and Murder of Robert “LaVoy” Finicum

Bundy Battle - Nevada, Bureau of Land Management, Constitution, CORRUPTION, Federal gov & land grabs, Freedoms - Individual, Media, Oregon governments, Over-regulations

PNP comment: I trust this report to be the most accurate. So far, the FBI is certainly not admitting to killing Finicum. The Main Stream Media writes headlines that make it sound like the Bundy group engaged in shots fired, which they did not. Yep, the way this came down, we know this was an ambush by law enforcement hoping to do some damage and it did.  — Editor Liz Bowen

The Ambush and Murder of Robert “LaVoy” Finicum

The Free Capitalist Project


BURNS, OREGON – on January 26, 2015 the FBI (with the help of other law enforcement) ambushed and murdered Robert “LaVoy” Finicum.  Based upon two personal eye-witness accounts, it is clear that the stories being widely circulated are false (due to laziness, misguided motives, or wickedness) and the truth should interest the friends of liberty, and those who want to know the actual fate of LaVoy and how our government agents acted yesterday.  

I had just been to visit LaVoy, Ammon Bundy, Ryan Bundy, Shawna Cox, and Ryan Payne the day before, and had only left the refuge yesterday morning in the very early hours.  In fact, I left just after our last Free Capitalist interview.  Shawna Cox was the last person I hugged.

I’ve already gone on record regarding my thoughts on the protest, on Ammon, and last night I did a Periscope broadcast related to the tragic death of LaVoy, along with the arrest of Ammon and Ryan Bundy, Shawna Cox, and others.  But, as the news has filtered out today, in both the mainstream and the alternative media I have been alarmed at the false accounts, hearsay accounts, and speculation regarding the events of that night.

Since I was not a witness to the arrest and shooting yesterday, I too have spent time scouring the Internet for the latest word and updates.  But, by this morning a disturbing and intolerable pattern had started to emerge and I cannot sit silently.   Here’s why – during my visit to meet and interview these men, I not only made contact and got to know them, I was also able to observe the workings and activities at the Refuge.   While I was there I observed, what now appears to be a portion of the sabotage that lead directly to the ambush, arrest, shooting and ultimately  the murder of LaVoy.

I didn’t realize then, what I was observing at the time.  In hindsight, it is now clear there were those on the inside working to help set last night’s police action.  This was not only a betrayal of trust for the Bundy’s, LaVoy and others, but something more sinister.  And, this is amplified by the false stories that are now circulating – and despicably so through outlets like OregonLive.com.  Make no mistake, based upon the only credible first hand witnesses – LaVoy Finicum was strategically ambushed and murdered – and the factual accounts must be defended and the false narratives resisted by those who love and cherish liberty.

There are three eye witness statements related to the events so far.  Of these, only two are credible.

First, the wife of Ammon Bundy, Lisa.  She reported that she received a phone call from Ammon, after his arrest and while he was in the back of the police car.  Ammon told her that LaVoy had been murdered, in cold blood with his “hands up” and that he had also been shot multiple times, even after he was on the ground.

Second, the driver of the first vehicle, Mark McConnell, was reportedly released after several hours of questioning, and he responded to the social media frenzy about LaVoy’s murder by debunking the concern, posting two videos arguing that LaVoy had acted aggressively and that LaVoy had charged at the FBI agents, provoking their shots.

Third, an 18-year old female passenger, Victoria Sharp, who was in the second vehicle that was driven by LaVoy, gave a detailed account of her experience and eye witness of LaVoy’s murder.

For the reasons explained below, only Lisa and Victoria’s accounts are credible.  Worse, Mark’s account and the activities and messages a few other “Patriot” group leaders are spreading are more than un-credible, they are suspect.

Lisa Bundy’s Account:  Lisa’s account was the first direct report of events that didn’t come from law enforcement or government sources.  And, both Lisa and Ammon have a sterling track record of focusing on calmly, rationally, and accurately disseminating the facts and circumstances surrounding these events.  Lisa’s account comes directly from Ammon – and given that Ammon is still in federal custody and there are no reports of anyone else having been able to talk with him, her account is highly valuable.  Certainly, once having verified that this report actually came from Lisa and her conversation with Ammon immediately after the tragic events – there is nothing suspect.  If Ammon Bundy says that LaVoy was murdered in cold blood – under these circumstances, and based upon my own assessment of Ammon’s character and the motives and interests at issue – then I give a very high degree of credibility to this account.   For the record, Lisa’s first hand statements are “I talked to Ammon after he was arrested…they shot [LaVoy] in cold blooded murder” and “He called me right after, gave me the details and told me to tell everyone before the news got out the lies. Then got off the phone!!!”

Mark McConnell’s Account:  Mark was the driver of the vehicle  (a Jeep) that was carrying Ammon.  Mark posted two videos that are being circulated among Oath Keeper members and other patriot group members (i.e. Melvin Less).  In Mark’s report he is visually upset about the “rumors” and “asinine comments” regarding how LaVoy was innocent and murdered.  But critically, he admits that he was too far away to witness the actual shooting. Yet, virtually every major media source is reporting his account as credible.  In his videos, he estimates that the shooting took place approximately 1 mile from where he was being detained and that he only saw the second vehicle drive off “from about 200 yards” towards the road block about “a mile” away.  But, the substance of his report is that he claims LaVoy subsequently exited his vehicle and “charged at the law enforcement” which provoked the shooting and his death.  But, what is the basis for this?  Mark says repeatedly, “I did not see the shooting” and that “I didn’t see it” and “I’m not going to speculate on it.”  Yet, he claims that LaVoy was “foolish” and had been in a “heated discussion” with fellow passenger Ryan Payne.   He contradicts himself repeatedly, because for some reason, he really wants people to “calm down.”  Apparently, this desire is even at the expense of the truth, and it may be worse.  Ryan Payne had exited vehicle number two (as described below) and was arrested and did was not present at the shooting.  Thus, there are only two living, non-government witnesses to all of the events – Shawna Cox and Victoria Sharp.  In sum, even Mark admits that his account is based upon second hand reports from Shawna Cox and Ryan Payne (both presumably still in custody) and based upon remarks that Mark said changed multiple times and that he was simply putting together “pieces here” and “pieces there.”

Victoria Sharp’s Account:  Victoria was a passenger in the back of the second vehicle driven by LaVoy.  She witnessed events from the initial stop of vehicle 1 all the way through to the shooting.  She has given a lengthy interview describing events – consistently and calmly.  In her report Victoria states that when LaVoy was first pulled over, he and Ryan Payne (who was the front seat passenger) repeatedly requested to talk to the county Sheriff rather than the FBI.   Her report is that this angered the FBI agents.  In response to FBI demands LaVoy put his hands – both hands – out the window to show he was not a threat.  She also reports that from the moment they were pulled over there were approximately 20 laser spots she could see on her and the other passengers, including from pre-positioned snipers in the trees, positioned on the side of the road up in the forest.   Significantly, she also reports that the first shots were fired by the FBI when Ryan Payne looked out the passenger side window and was shot at, but was not hit.  She reports that no one in the vehicle ever returned fire or pulled any guns or weapons.  According to Victoria, after the FBI refused LaVoy and Ryan’s request to remove the two woman from the vehicle (who had come along to sing at the anticipated meeting), LaVoy explained that he was going to drive down to talk to the Sheriff and started to drive away.  At or about this point, according to her account, Ryan Payne exited the vehicle and was arrested.  The two women in the back seat (Shawna Cox and Victoria) along with Ryan Bundy (also in the back seat) tried to take cover laying on the floor boards because as LaVoy drove away the FBI showered the vehicle with bullets – “at least 120.”   Victoria recounts that she and Shawna were screaming and pleading that the FBI stop shooting.   Victoria then explains that LaVoy drove the truck into some kind of snow embankment and it was stuck, so he got out of the truck with his hands up.  She says he was “just walking with his hands in the air.”  According to her account, she then personally witnessed that the FBI, and multiple shooters shot him multiple times, including after he hit the ground and that as he lay dead on the ground his hands were still up above his head.  She then says, after this, the government continued to riddle the vehicle with dozens, possibly hundreds of bullets, and that the only reason the two women and Ryan Bundy survived was that the shooters had a bad angle.   Ryan Bundy was hit by a bullet or shrapnel caused by this firestorm.

Thus, the most credible accounts, and the only complete first hand account, is that the government pre-planned this encounter, it was no “traffic stop” as the US Attorney is now reporting (“a traffic stop on protesters [that] turned deadly.”) It was deadly from before it started, because it was a pre-planned extraordinary show of force by the government, and shooting began without any shots being fired by LaVoy or the passengers in his vehicle.  The government agents continued to fire on a fleeing vehicle despite having set up a road block and despite no threat of force by LaVoy or the passengers, and after one of the passengers exited the vehicle and was arrested.  They shot LaVoy with his hands in the air, and continued to shoot him after he fell to the ground.  The government then continued to fire upon the vehicle with three passengers huddling down in the back seat on the floor.  This was, by all accounts, a military style ambush, and there is no indication that the government agents were in danger at any time, or that the excessive use of force was provoked or justified.

The credibility of Ammon and Victoria weighs heavily towards their accounts, while the sole contradictory account of Mr. McConnell is by his own admission, based upon him piecing together hearsay.  But, is that all that’s going on here?

As I reviewed these facts, there are a few striking elements and events.  First, the government clearly knew the travel plans of these parties – including the timing and the route.  Second, the government made no advance effort to avoid violence – this was a secretive operation.  The significance of this might be overlooked by modern presumptions and media spin, but fair observers have to remember that Ammon and LaVoy were repeatedly open to discuss matters with the government.  They routinely went to the FBI operations center and the Sheriff’s station to discuss their protest and their grievances.   And, earlier yesterday, approximately five hours before these events, the FBI had been invited by Ammon to come to the Refuge and have a face-to-face discussion.  In all of this, neither Ammon nor LaVoy were given any demands by the FBI and they were repeatedly given free pass at public gatherings and eating at local restaurants, etc.   The point here is that the government clearly used surprise, and massive show of force, against men who on all previous encounters had been civil, rational, and reliably calm and willing to talk.  In addition, no demand had been made to them, except the Sheriff’s initial demand that they leave the Refuge.  This is a critical point because – after the refusal of the Harney County Sheriff’s offer of safe passage – Ammon and LaVoy told the Sheriff directly that they would consider his offer at a later date.  That is the LAST discussion prior to these events regarding any demand made upon the leaders of the protest and occupation.  Thus, it should have been no surprise that LaVoy would have been caught off guard by this massive operation, and the massive show of force, and that LaVoy would specifically ask to go and speak to the Sheriff.  Now, it may have been that LaVoy was wanting to go and speak with the Sheriff of Grant County (where this all occurred).  It is widely known that unlike the Harney County Sheriff, Grant County Sheriff Glenn Palmer had publicly stated that the FBI should leave, and that the federal government should engage in a discussion of the grievances of the protesters.  Quite literally, according to Victoria’s account, the massive ambush and use of force was employed by the FBI in response to LaVoy trying to go to the man in government and law enforcement that was most receptive to his prior request for safety and protection.  That same man, Sheriff Palmer is also the central law enforcement figure in the county where this incident took place.   This may not have occurred to anyone yet, but given that I work in the legal world for a living – an act to prevent LaVoy and others from petitioning for relief from the duly authorized Sheriff is ALSO quite possibly a felony violation of federal law, by the government – in fact, the same federal law under which these parties have now all been charged.  The scheme of the FBI clearly interfered with the Sheriff’s ability to exercise his duty, and these citizens’ right to petition Sheriff Palmer.  While the FBI could defend itself by saying that an arrest would only be a temporary restriction and both Sheriff Palmer and these parties could talk later – by implementing their plan, directly in response to LaVoy invoking this choice – that defense would be more difficult, particularly given that LaVoy is dead.

In any event, the significant consideration here is that law enforcement clearly had inside help.  During my visit to the Refuge I observed purported militia members acting suspiciously and apparently giving reports of the travel plans for Ammon and Ryan Payne to someone outside and this included details of the timing of this very incident, less than 24 hours before it occurred.  In fact, while I didn’t know it at the time, the subject of the conversation was a printed flyer advertising last night’s events – in Grant County where Ammon and Ryan were invited to be the speakers.  Think about this, and the timing.  It was widely reported, including by the New York Times, that Ammon and LaVoy had already reached out to Sheriff Palmer.  Why?  Because Sheriff Palmer is a member of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA), had previously been that organizations “lawman of the year” and had openly challenged the jurisdiction of federal agents in his county. In fact, LaVoy knew that Sheriff Palmer had publicly challenged the notion that federal agents had any law enforcement or policing authority in Grant County, outside of the confines of the federal court house.  Now, a community event was scheduled and Ammon and LaVoy and Ryan had been invited.  It seems quite likely, that the federal government intervened, how and when it did, to prevent Ammon, Ryan and LaVoy from securing any further sympathy or assistance from Sheriff Palmer and/or the people of Grant County.  Think this is too conspiratorial?  NBCNEWS.COM is reporting the same thing.  Pete Williams recently published, “The decision to carry out the arrests was set into motion when the defiant leaders left the refuge Tuesday to attend a community meeting in the town of John Day.”  Given the massive show of force and preparation (snipers in the woods, road block etc.) and the short amount of travel time, this “decision to carry out the arrests” was pre-planned and prepared and when Ammon and LaVoy and Ryan decided they were going for sure – the plan was “set into motion.”   I should also note, that everyone at the Refuge knew something was different, and early in the morning there were reports of planes landing nearby in the dark, and of pre-positioned supplies staged by the government around the perimeter.

Finally, all of this makes more troubling, any accounts by purported patriot groups or supposed militia members, that directly contradict Ammon and Victoria, based on nothing more than hearsay.   As we speak, the Refuge is under siege, with the last remaining holdouts still refusing to surrender.  The live video stream has revealed that the remaining armed resistance supporting the occupation are independent supporters with the exception of a few “3 Percenters” and one or two from outside militias.    Where are the Oath Keepers?  Where is the perimeter other groups openly told the FBI that they were establishing to “prevent another Waco?”

Wherever they are, the organized militia groups are not at the Refuge, are not there to defend these last few occupiers who believe wholeheartedly that they are making a stand against tyranny, and who are now emboldened by the ambush and murder of LaVoy Finicum.   On their website Oath Keepers has a news report about events, and has published an official release from “The Pacific Patriots Network” issuing an “immediate “STAND BY” Order to all those who are mobilizing” in response to LaVoy’s murder, stating “[w]e will not pursue any action until all of the facts have been pieced together regarding the traffic stop and the arrest of Ammon Bundy.”  See the parroted language of the government about a purported “traffic stop?”  That is spin. Think I’m going to far?  Again, even NBCNWS has noticed.  Pete Williams also reports that “The FBI earlier described the stop as an “enforcement action” done by federal agents and Oregon State Police in connection with the occupation.” rather than as a routine “traffic stop.”   Finally, Brian Miller and the official “Three Percenter” club is now stating that its members should wait “until we can clear everything up” and is advising those who want “to go and get involved to stay away from the refuge I repeat stay away.”

What happened is clear.  Its the story being told that is getting all muddy, with all the hand wringing, posturing, and butt-covering.  Look, I’m always for cooler headers, rational thinking, and sound strategy.  But, that seems to be missing from Mr. McConnell and those spreading his hearsay, ironically after he has villified reports based upon one of only two actual eye-witnesses to the whole event – including LaVoy’s murder.

In the end, here is the truth.  The government could have, but didn’t prevent this.  The 3 Percenters could have, but didn’t prevent this.  The Oath Keepers, the Pacific Patriots Network and other militia groups, could have prevented this, but didn’t.  Blood has been spilled, as a significant group of Americans – from all walks of life and all over this country attempted to stand in resistance to tyranny.

Justice Scalia recently re-affirmed that “when the able-bodied men of a nation are trained in arms and organized, they are better able to resist tyranny.”  The fact that LaVoy is dead, one day shy of his 56th birthday, is a rebuke to those of us in the liberty movement.  It is a stinging rebuke.  We are not well trained or well organized, and we are certainly not united.

More than 60 years ago, the great scholar and Constitutional advocate J. Reuben Clark warned that “we stand in danger of losing our liberties, and that once lost, only blood will bring them back.” He also warned, “I say to you that the price of liberty is and always has been blood, human blood, and if our liberties are lost, we shall never regain them except at the price of blood.”

I have deep respect for these militia groups I’ve criticized, and I have deep respect for our country and its government.  I have come to love, respect and appreciate the Bundy’s and those who rallied with them, including LaVoy.  Among his last words to me were a proclamation of his faith in Christ and in this Country and in the Cause of Liberty.  He knew the risks involved, and he had a genuine, cheerful smile on his face – that accompanied what he profoundly risked.     But all of this is not enough.  Being “trained in arms and organized” means more than bravado, ammunition, big guns, and camouflage.  It means more than prominence and respectability for big groups and big names.    And it must also means more than Facebook and Twitter warriors, and less than credible alternative media reporters who advocate as much personal nonsense as they do principles of liberty.

If we want to recover from this stinging rebuke, we’ve got to do something that no generation of freedom loving people has yet done, since the time of America’s Founding.  We’ve got to be organized, as Jefferson predicted, from the great national government, down through the states and counties, to the individual households of our people.  We’ve got to be trained in arms and have organized militia’s but this is less than 1/7th of the blueprint.   We will never outgun or out militarize the United States or any of her states.  Thus, while force and militia’s are essential and invaluable, by themselves, they are the unorganized, infighting tragedy we’ve just witnessed.  We’ve got to build a full society of men and women who are committed to the principles of liberty as enshrined in the Declaration and the Constitution.   In addition to militias, we must command educational, financial, and media control – and this is all still only 50% of the blueprint.  I could tell you more, and outline the blueprint here – but that will have to be for a follow-up publication or broadcast.

In sum, every time a tragedy like this happens, the hearts and minds of patriots are pricked, energy and passion flow, and the prevalent question is “what do we do now?”  If the reader is honest, I think this is the question that is before us today – all of us.  What do we do now?  That has been the question I heard first as a boy, and it has resounded even in my own liberty organizations – every time our failure increases its intensity and the cause of liberty is revealed to be failing.  Why?

I’ll tell you the answer.

Its because this is not a simple or quick fix.  It is not something one person, or a small group can do.  Its not a hobby or a club.  It is not for the feint of heart, and it is not for broken homes and broken marriages that bicker over budgets and neglect children for fleeting hobbies. We have to rise above and work though these things.  And, as a side note – a commitment to liberty can do that.  The path forward requires dedicated Americans.  Dedicated, red-blooded Americans from all walks of life, from all of our varied subgroups and subcultures, who are REALLY willing to stand up for freedom no matter the case – and unite under the banner of liberty.  But, even this is still not enough.  It takes a blueprint, so we can build a veritable liberty based society that can quickly and powerfully correct America’s course, and powerfully and uncompromisingly influence the course of her institutions – its churches, its schools, its governments, its medicine, its businesses, its culture and its play.  That, my friends, is  a tall order, so tall – that the vast majority of our patriots either give up, tune out, wimp out – or minimize and marginalize to focus on only a small piece of this puzzle.    But, that won’t due.

When I last talked with LaVoy he was fascinated as I explained to him why I had come to talk with him, to discuss this circumstance of the occupation and to visit with Ammon and Ryan face-to-face.  I told him that I saw the heart, the Spirit of the Lord, and the conviction of these patriots, that I could see it in their eyes, and in their actions and in how they had comported themselves.   I told him that I was undeniably required to show him and Ammon and Ryan and the others my respect and love.  But, I also told him about a broader view, and throughout the day, I  told him that while I didn’t want to be critical or suggest that anything in the liberty movement or in the efforts of these protesters at the Refuge was bad, or wrong, or misguided – I did tell him squarely, that it needed to be pushed forward, advanced, and taken up to the next level.  I told him that I respected what he and Ammon and the others were doing, and that I only wanted to see their goals successful, and that I had some experience and insight and an small, rebuilding group of liberty lovers spread across this nation who could help with the larger, overall cause.  He agreed, and smiled hopefully.  He arranged for us to meet with several of the key people at the Refuge, and we spent the day there.  It was quite a day.  Towards the evening we were able to listen to Ryan’s presentation and then start to share this same perspective of the broader blueprint with Ryan and Ammon and others.  But, that was just the beginning.

Yesterday, those with eyes to see, saw an undeniable reality check, about where we stand with our freedoms and liberty, and how overstretched and oppressive federal and state law enforcement has become.  We cannot deny how quick to anger we as a people have become – especially through our government.  We cannot deny how slow to reason, to act in good faith, and how intolerant are our government agencies and their bureaucrats.  We also saw how futile are our best efforts are- even through groups like I’ve mentioned.  We fight our enemies and ourselves, and liberty suffers – and blood is spilled.  In the end – we saw the deliberate and strategic ambush and subsequent murder of Robert “LaVoy” Finicum.  Whatever others think of him, he was an American.  He was a man committed to a cause – and that cause was liberty!  The world is not better with him dead, our government is weaker with these horrible acts of tyranny and the people who know what is going on – are heart-broken, stunned, and many are angry.  Hopefully.

Today, we have friends in jail.  The US Attorney says they will be arraigned about 5 minutes after I publish this – after that they will prosecuted by a United States Attorney with the full force of our government and the financial and legal resources it commands.   These friends will need defended.  That will take resources, good minds, and passionate support.  I here publicly pledge mine.  Anyone who has direct contact with these men and woman are invited to reach out to me directly – I will help.

LaVoy confessed to the media that he believed freedom was sometimes more important than life.  He has proved his sincerity.  Have we?  His test in this life is over.  Ours is not.  How much more blood must be spilled – before YOU, my friend reading this, will make a choice?

Do you think you’ve already made the choice? Do you already stand for liberty?  Me too.  But it is not enough!  Self-evidently it is not enough.  We have got to advance this cause.  We have got to elevate our power and effectiveness.  Too many Americans are living lives of quiet desperation – in all areas – while the tyranny of unjust men marches forward.   It is simply not enough.  Whatever you’ve said to yourself up until now, Robert “LaVoy” Finicum is a new witness, in a long line of witnesses – inviting us to pick up the torch and carry it further.  But, we HAVE to carry it further.  We have to build a real, veritable liberty society of patriots – or we lose.

We’ve been loosing a lot lately – politically, legally, socially, economically, etc.  But, the cause of liberty will not lose. We can accomplish what no prior group of Americans has accomplished – we can finish the work of our Founder’s revolution and take liberty, prosperity and peace – even further. Let us come together.  Let us awake and arise.  I know that some of you, a few of you, can “hear” me.  Let’s go. I invite you to reach out.  Make contact with each other, with other lover’s of liberty – and with me.  We’ve got to help our friends.  What an example they have been.  We’ve got to stand for liberty.  This is not just about ranchers – its about all Americans.

We’ve got to do it based upon principles – and a strategic blueprint that can win!

Its a tall order.  A very tall order.  Nevertheless, it can be done.  If not us, who?  If not now, when?

If you only hope that is true – reach out.  Make contact.  I’ll show you.

— End


No Comments

Political Action Committee formed to challenge State of Jefferson movement


1:56 PM, Apr 14, 2015
1:58 PM, Apr 14, 2015

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA – As the effort to create a 51st state continues to push forward across several Northern California counties, a new political action committee has formed to fight the State of Jefferson movement.

The Keep It California PAC’s formation was announced on Monday – the 272nd birthday of President Thomas Jefferson, who has become the new state’s namesake.

In its announcement, the group quoted Jefferson in illustrating its opposition to the new state: “I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend.”

A group of concerned citizens from around rural California met in Redding on April 7, where they voted to form the new multi-county, nonpartisan political action committee.

At the meeting, the PAC’s principal officers were elected: campaign Chair Cindy Ellsmore, Sierra County; spokesman and Vice Chair Kevin Hendrick, Del Norte County; campaign headquarters Vice Chair Rob Rowen, Shasta County; Secretary Dolly Verrue, Siskiyou County; Treasurer John Mertes, Del Norte County; and Assistant Treasurer Larry Marks, Siskiyou County.

Mark Baird, a leader and spokesman for the State of Jefferson effort, greeted the news by saying the opposing group had a First Amendment right to take the action.

Baird said of his movement, “It is raising awareness in the capital that at least eight counties are upset with their lack of representation at the state level,” and added, “How can that be bad for anybody, no matter what it is you want your county to do?”

Ellsmore said the Keep It California PAC was formed to represent the interest of all Republican, Democrat and Independent voters who oppose separation from California. “Our mission is to advocate for better representation of rural California and to oppose breaking away to form a new state.”

In March, the Lake County Board of Supervisors voted 3-2 to put an advisory measure before voters in November 2016 regarding whether the board should adopt a declaration of support for the county’s separation from California.

Later in the month, the Lassen County Board of Supervisors took similar action, voting to place an advisory measure on the June 2016 ballot.

Last year, Del Norte County voters defeated a similar advisory measure, Shasta and Plumas counties last year declined to take part, and Butte County put off its consideration.

Glenn, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama and Yuba counties have taken formal actions to join the State of Jefferson.

Ellsmore said most rural counties get back more money than local taxpayers pay to the state of California.

“If we separate from California, our communities will lose millions of dollars in funding for roads, education, and social services for youth, families and seniors. Jobs funded by the state through our schools, counties, parks, prisons, police and nonprofit community provide living wage employment which helps support our local economy,” she said.

Hendrick was the director of the Keep It California campaign in Del Norte County, which defeated the proposed State of Jefferson advisory measure with a 58-percent no vote in June.

He said the organization is forming local coordinating committees in every county where State of Jefferson proponents are active.

Hendrick said they have volunteers in 20 counties building these committees to monitor and respond to any incursions by Jefferson proponents.

“Wherever they show up we want to have people there asking questions or pointing out facts,” he said.

In addition, Hendrick said Keep It California will provide material and financial assistance to these local efforts, inform voters and elected officials about what it called the “disastrous consequences” of separating from California, and will encourage local agencies to evaluate the financial risks and uncertainties about joining the movement.

He said a number of people from Lake County already have indicated an interest in organizing – whether they form their own committee or work under Keep It California’s umbrella.

At the time the Board of Supervisors took its actions, a local Facebook group formed titled “State of Jefferson Resistance.”

The Fair Political Practices Commission number for the PAC is still pending.

The State of Jefferson has have had a small PAC for some time, according to Baird.

Baird, who doesn’t sit on the State of Jefferson’s board of directors, said he didn’t have a lot of information about the PAC, but said it was used to pay for advertising on radio shows and similar outreach.

Searches of the Web sites for the California Secretary of State and the Fair Political Practices Commission didn’t turn up any information on such a committee, although if the Jefferson PAC raised less than $1,000 in a calendar year it may not have been required to file, based on a reading of state guidelines.

Two sides argue perspectives

The two sides are aggressive in putting out their viewpoints and in pointing out what they consider are each others’ shortcomings.

Baird, a police officer and retired airline captain who wrote the first Jefferson declaration, said he wants liberty and a better life for his son and other young people.

“We want the people of Northern California to take responsibility for their own lives and say how they would like their government to serve them,” he said.

Responded Hendrick, “The general consensus on our side is, it’s just wasting everyone’s time.”

However, he added, “This has to be more than pushing back on the State of Jefferson. There are real issues in rural counties.”

Hendrick said rural counties need to help government representatives understand their unique issues. “If we can get our rural representatives to caucus, it gives us a bigger voice.”

Baird said of the opposition, “It’s really hard to defend against the emotional argument,” claiming those opposed to Jefferson say there will be no police or hospitals if it becomes a reality. “I wonder how the 49 states that aren’t named California make it.”

Jefferson’s opponents, however, similarly fault it for appeals to emotion with not enough analysis to back up its claims.

For their part, State of Jefferson representatives locally and in the larger statewide movement say they’re pressing ahead.

“We’ve been working with Mendocino County and Colusa County this past month with their town halls and their meetings,” said Truman Bernal of Kelseyville, who had taken the Jefferson matter to the Board of Supervisors.

Baird said so far there has been one town hall in Mendocino County, and more will be needed to educate the county’s large population.

Baird was to be in Trinity County on Tuesday to speak to a county supervisor there.

Also on Tuesday, Steve Baird – not a relation but a friend of Mark Baird’s – will make a presentation to the Plumas County Board of Supervisors on how he believes that county could benefit.

Hendrick said Ellsmore and other Keep It California members will be there in Plumas County to present their side of the issue.

A presentation also is set to take place before the Nevada County Board of Supervisors on May 12, Mark Baird said.

“We’re not telling people how to live,” Baird said. “We’re asking them, is California a good business partner for you?”

He said he’s surprised there has been any pushback at all in small counties like Lake, explaining that Jefferson is offering the chance for each county to have its own senator and Assembly member.

He said the Jefferson movement is entirely grassroots, with no corporate or business sponsorship. All of the people who travel around to meetings do so at their own expense.

The State of Jefferson doesn’t have a party affiliation, said Baird.

“We’re not members of the Tea Party, either,” he said in response to suggestions that the State of Jefferson is an outgrowth of the Tea Party movement. He said he also has no personal party affiliation.

In return, he alleged that unions have used scare tactics and pumped large amounts of money into the coffers of the opposition, thus the defeat of Del Norte County’s advisory measure.

Assemblyman Bill Dodd, who took office representing the the Fourth Assembly District – including Lake County – in December, told community members at a Friday meeting that while he understands the frustration behind the State of Jefferson movement, he predicted it ultimately won’t succeed.

“It’s never going to pass muster,” he said, but added that rural counties do need more attention.

If the State of Jefferson movement doesn’t succeed in getting support for legislation to split off from California, Baird said supporters plan to move forward with a lawsuit challenging Reynolds v. Sims, the 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that required that legislative districts in states have equal population numbers.

To fund that suit, Baird said they plan to pursue $100 donations each from 10,000 people. If that fails, they could try to trigger a convention of states.

Keep It California can be reached via email at info@keepitcalifornia.org , and on the Internet at www.keepitcalifornia.org andhttps://www.facebook.com/KeepItCalifornia?fref=ts .

The State of Jefferson can be reached via its contact page at http://www.soj51.net/home.html , and visited online athttps://www.facebook.com/pages/State-of-Jefferson/507464432650933?fref=ts or https://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-for-State-of-Jefferson/153506214844491?fref=ts .

Email Elizabeth Larson at elarson@lakeconews.com . Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, or Lake County News, @LakeCoNews.
This story originally appeared in the Lake County News: http://www.lakeconews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=41366:political-action-committee-forms-to-challenge-state-of-jefferson-movement&catid=1:latest&Itemid=197


No Comments

Two more counties approve Jefferson Declaration


Trinity Gazette

Feb. 28, 2015

By Liz Bowen, Jefferson Declaration Committee

The New Year has been busy for leaders of the Jefferson Declaration project with Town Halls and county supervisor meetings up and down Northern California. February was especially good as two more county supervisor boards approved the need to split from California.
On Feb. 17, 2015, the Lake County Supervisors voted 4-1 in favor of the Declaration, but the wording on the Declaration will be revisited at the board’s March 3rd meeting and voted upon.
Then on Feb. 24, 2015, Lassen County Supervisors approved the Declaration with a 3-1 vote and will add unique wording to the Declaration for another vote on March 17.
Jefferson Spokesman Mark Baird said that both meetings received a great turn-out from Jefferson supporters, but the Lake County meeting found Jefferson’s first organized opposition of several dozen women that sat in a block group. Many of those in opposition said they liked California’s present governing style and felt California was sufficient as it is.
“But we did prevail,” said Baird of the Lake County meeting and was proud of the supervisors for recognizing the importance of equal representation, which is something Northern California no longer enjoys, because only six officials are elected to the legislature compared with 114 elected assembly and senators in the rest of the state. Baird was also quick to “thank God” for the positive outcome at the Lake County meeting as the opposition did beat a drum.
Baird then praised Truman and Sheryl Bernal and Randy Sutton for their tireless efforts and leadership as the heart of the Jefferson Lake County Committee. With the opposition that spoke, Baird said it seemed like a miracle when the supervisors voted 4-1 in favor.
Then more than 100 Jefferson supporters showed up and spoke to the Lassen County Supervisors with no opposition – only one man asking how Jefferson will survive without the welfare monies from California. The answer is easy. California is in debt to the tune of $423 billion. With this kind of debt, how much longer will California survive?
With the addition of Lake and Lassen Counties, there are now eight counties supporting the Declaration to withdraw from the State of California. Siskiyou County was the first on Sept. 3, 2013 and neighboring Modoc County Supervisors came on board just three weeks later on Sept. 24, 2014. In January of 2014, Glenn County Supervisors voted 5-0 in favor of the split; Yuba, Tehama and Sutter then joined in 2014.
On Aug. 28, 2014, the Declarations from Siskiyou and Modoc were officially presented to the California State Legislature and the Secretary of State. On Jan. 15, 2015, Glenn, Yuba and Tehama Declarations were presented to the State. State of Jefferson Rallies were held on the West steps of the California Capitol with several 100 supporters waving flags on both Declaration Days.
Baird said March will also be busy with meetings in Colusa, Mendocino, Lake and Lassen Counties. On March 20th, Baird will be on the Lars Larson radio show.
Check out website Jefferson Declaration.net for updates on meetings and youtube videos.
El Dorado Jefferson Committee is holding a Town Hall on Sat. Feb. 28, 2015 at 2 p.m. at the American Legion Hall Post 119, 4561 Greenstone Road in Placerville.
A Town Hall in Arbuckle will be held on March 8th and Mendocino Jefferson Committee has a Town Hall planned for March 21 at the fairgrounds.
A new website, which includes detailed financial viability for counties joining the potential State of Jefferson can be found at: SOJ51.net
# # #

Comment: Lake Co. Supervisors approved new wording for the Lake resolution voting  3-2 on March 3, 2015.

Jefferson Declaration.net website now links to a new website:  soj51.net

You can still find Jefferson Declaration website at its new name:

Jefferson Declaration Blog.net


No Comments

‘Climate engineering’ believers protest media


11:21 AM, Dec 5, 2014
Redding Record Searchlight

Copyright 2014 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Clay Duda/Record Searchlight

Some 60-70 people protested the Record Searchlight this morning because they believe the local media is “stonewalling” the public on so-called climate engineering.
The group, about 60 to 70 as of 10:45 a.m. showed up at the corner of Twin View Boulevard and Constitution Way at 10 a.m. They plan to picket in front of KRCR Channel 7 on Auditorium Drive later today.
“We are just trying to help get the media focused on what we are doing and our cause, and to stop putting it way out there in the corner that this is something that is way out there or tinfoil-hat wearers,” said Bob Edmondson, whose family owns Country Organics in Redding. “These are concerned citizens that are trying to raise awareness.”
Record Searchlight Editor Silas Lyons said the paper loves the First Amendment and welcomes people who turn out in the rain “to peaceably assemble and have their voice heard.”
“As the newspaper of record for this community, we have a duty to avoid being a platform for fully discredited statements passed off as fact. There is simply no credible evidence of a vast government conspiracy to poison our air, and we’d be derelict if we covered the subject as if it were anything other than what it is – a conspiracy theory,” Lyons said.

Silas Lyons 225-8210 slyons@redding.com

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

No Comments

6th county in Jefferson is official

JEFFERSON DECLARATION, Jefferson News Service, Media, State of Jefferson

Trinity Gazette

July 2014

By Liz Bowen, Jefferson News Service.com

YUBA CITY – Two counties made it official this past month and have joined the State of Jefferson movement making a total of six counties in Northern California that desire to create the 51st State in the USA.

It was Tuesday, July 22nd when the Sutter County Board of Supervisors approved a “resolution supporting the Declaration and Petition to the California State Legislature for redress from lack of representation and possible formation of a new State of Jefferson.” The vote was 5-0.

Dave Bryan, leader of the Jefferson Committee in the Sutter area, said he was encouraged by the “hearty response” from the Sutter Supervisors. “I applaud their courageous leadership and thank God that our leaders are not content with the status quo!”

Supervisor James Gallagher led the charge echoing the grievances of “the people” and the current poor state of affairs in California. The other supervisors each shared their frustration with the lack of equal voice at the capital level. Board Chairman Stan Cleveland supported the Jefferson effort from the beginning and worked to address any concerns.

Then on July 15, 2014, the Tehama County Supervisors voted 5-0 approving the “Declaration and Petition” to withdraw from the State of California making it the fifth county to officially join the new Jefferson State movement. The supervisors were following up on an approved motion that sent the ultimate decision on splitting from California to the voters of Tehama County. And on June 3rd, during the Primary Election, Tehama voters did pass Measure A with a 56 percent approval.

Tom Knorr, leader of the Tehama Jefferson Declaration Committee, said he was pleased the “supervisors stuck with their promise” and made the vote unanimous. “We achieved something important. People are getting motivated for the State of Jefferson,” he said.

Because the supervisors placed the Measure on the ballot, the Tehama Jefferson Committee found itself in a campaign with little funding and only a few months before the election. It was a grass roots effort to educate the public, but there were many good and enthusiastic supporters willing to put in time and effort.

Knorr said the committee became quite creative and even built a huge float for the Red Bluff Rodeo Parade, in April that depicted a sinking ship called “California” burdened with heavy debt. A life boat was titled “State of Jefferson”; and the float was shared with other events and counties.
It was just 10 months ago, when a fledging grass roots group approached the Siskiyou County Supervisors, at first, asking for a resolution to split from California. But on Sept. 3, 2013, Siskiyou County Supervisors approved a “Declaration” to withdraw from California with a 4-1 vote. Modoc, Glenn and Yuba Supervisors then took the plunge and approved the Declaration.

Mark Baird, spokesman for the Jefferson Declaration Committee,
said the “voice of the people has been heard” and welcomed Sutter and Yuba Counties. “It’s a great day for the State of Jefferson,” he said.

Since last September, Baird has been on a speaking tour of Town Halls in various counties and to county boards of supervisors. Lately, meetings and committees have sprung up in the southern part of a would-be Jefferson. Placer and El Dorado have held Town Halls and committees were just recently organized in Nevada and Plumas Counties with Town Halls being organized.

Lake County was the most recent Town Hall on July 11, 2014, where over 125 interested people showed up. Truman and Sheryl Bernal have been leading the Lake County Jefferson project and were pleased with the enthusiasm and expansion of their committee. Truman said they now have several active businesses helping to gather “support statement” signatures that will be given to the Lake County Supervisors — when the time is right.

Baird spoke to the Sutter County Supervisors on July 8th along with a dozen others and the room was packed with supporters. The supervisors discussed the Declaration and decided to write a “resolution” and did indeed become the sixth county to agree that California is too big and lacks safe government.

Currently, the list of active Jefferson Declaration County Committees now includes: Siskiyou, Modoc, Glenn, Yuba, Tehama, Sutter, Butte, Shasta, Lake, Placer, Plumas, El Dorado, Nevada, Lassen, Del Norte and Trinity. Anyone who would like to support the cause can contact the Committee leaders in each county, which are found on the county pages on the website: JeffersonDeclaration.net.

The website is a blog and is updated daily, so check it out for more information, progress of various counties and dates for Town Hall meetings.

Because Baird and other speakers have been asked a variety of questions over and over again, a group of short youtube videos have been put together, where Baird provides the practical and up-front answers. They are titled: Question Mark? So far 16 of these two to three minute videos have been posted on the Jefferson Declaration.net website and can be found at the top page/tab called: QUESTIONS.
Three county committees in Butte, Placer and Del Norte, have put together extensive websites with financial information along with additional questions and answers. They are well worth checking out. They are: www.JeffersonButte.com; www.placerjeffersonstate.net/; and www.delnortejefferson.net.

Counties can also be found on facebook by putting in the county name and then “for the State of Jefferson.” There is also “Jefferson State News” on facebook with up-to-date info, including Town Hall dates and other events.
A weekly hour-long talk show “Jefferson State of Mine” can be found on Redding’s KNCR 1460 AM every Saturday morning at 8 a.m. with hosts Red Smith and Kayla Brown. For archived shows on the web, go to: kncr1460.com or listen to it stream live.
Daily radio “News in Jefferson Country” can be found on the web at: Jefferson News Service.com, which are broadcast on KSYC 103.9 FM from Yreka, CA and KSIZ 102.3 FM radio from Mt. Shasta.
# # #

No Comments

Great day for State of Jefferson

Elections, JEFFERSON DECLARATION, Jefferson News Service, KSYC radio, Media, News in Jefferson Country

News in Jefferson Country

From Jefferson News Service.com

 June 5, 2014

 Listen LIVE on the web !


Broadcast on KSYC 103.9 FM Yreka, CA

At 5:45 p.m. on the Joe Show

And KSIZ 102.3 FM at 7:45 a.m.

from Mt. Shasta, CA


News in Jefferson Country from Pie N Politics.com Editor Liz Bowen: The Jefferson Declaration Committee was cheering yesterday as a fifth county joined the State of Jefferson project.


“It is a great day for the State of Jefferson,” said spokesman Mark Baird. “The great County of Tehama approved Measure A in the Primary Election on June 3rd. Tehama citizens approved the Measure with a 55 percent vote showing they favor less government involvement in their lives.”


Tehama now joins the Counties of Modoc, Glenn, Yuba and Siskiyou in their Declaration to withdraw from the State of California.


But two other measures lost – one in Siskiyou and one in Del Norte, which has caused confusion.


Del Norte County Supervisors also placed a Measure A on the ballot for the voters to decide about splitting from California. Then opposition from the SEIU and AFL-CIO Unions spent over $40,000 dollars in a media campaign against the Declaration to withdraw from California. Measure A lost in Del Norte County with only 41 percent of the vote. 


Yet, the most difficult to understand is the Jefferson Republic Territory Measure C in Siskiyou County, which also lost by 41 percent of the vote — and national media picked up on the irony.


“Don’t be confused by the media’s misstatements about Siskiyou County,” said Jefferson Spokesman Baird. “The failure of Measure C and its Territory Special District has absolutely nothing to do with the State of Jefferson. Measure C was an attempt to hijack the support of the State of Jefferson — an attempt which failed, and rightly so, said Baird. The State of Jefferson is in full force. We have just added a fifth county to the growing project.”


For More news on the State of Jefferson project go to:



For more News in Jefferson Country go to:


No Comments

Clearning up another lame-stream media “spin” on Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy

Agriculture, Bundy Battle - Nevada, Bureau of Land Management, Federal gov & land grabs, Media

Here is a video the main-stream media won’t report on.

African-American Bodyguard Would Take Bullet For Bundy – YouTube

No Comments