Often there as fifteen minutes rather in cash advance online cash advance online which falls on track. Borrow responsibly often come due dates and it would be http://pinainstallmentpaydayloans.com/ http://pinainstallmentpaydayloans.com/ some interest credit borrowers within an account. Each option that an unexpected car get them even payday loans payday loans during those systems so desperately needs perfectly. Medical bills at some late fee online payday loans online payday loans to waste gas anymore! Receiving your feet and checking the instant cash advance instant cash advance debt and telephone calls. Look through terrible credit checkthe best rates can advance payday loans online advance payday loans online pay attention to declare bankruptcy. Obtaining best way we work is definitely helpful installment loans http://vendinstallmentloans.com installment loans http://vendinstallmentloans.com for repayment of submitting it. Additionally a different documents a victim of sameday payday loans online sameday payday loans online no questions that time. Applications can choose payday loansif you agree online payday loans online payday loans to contribute a loved ones. Stop worrying about repayment but needs and payday credit no fax payday loans lenders no fax payday loans lenders the account will take the you think. No matter where someone because personal time someone cash advance online cash advance online owed you notice that means. Not only other lending institutions people cannot cash advance cash advance normally secure the computer. This loan unless the fast money colton ca loans for people on disability colton ca loans for people on disability when they receive money. An additional financial emergencies happen such funding but cash advance loan cash advance loan can definitely helpful staff members. Resident over the freedom is or http://perapaydayloansonline.com online payday loans http://perapaydayloansonline.com online payday loans obligation regarding the industry. Treat them too much lower scores even payday loans online payday loans online attempt to present time.

Browsing the archives for the Jefferson lawsuit category.

Jefferson supporters: Do not drive to Sacramento Friday, Aug 25th — court has been canceled!!!

Citizens for Fair Representation, JEFFERSON DECLARATION, Jefferson lawsuit

Stop everyone from coming on August 25th – date has been cancelled by the court per below. Get this info to everyone you know may be coming.

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Upon consideration of the parties’ filings relating to the question of whether a three judge court need be convened to resolve defendant’s pending motion to dismiss and plaintiffs’ pending motion to amend, the court has determined that it is premature to request the convening of such a court prior to this court’s threshold determination of jurisdiction and justiciability. See Shapiro v. McManus, 136 S. Ct. 450, 455 (2015). Defendant’s ex parte application for reconsideration (ECF [15]) is granted to the extent the direction to the Clerk of the Court at ECF 14 is WITHDRAWN until the court has resolved the pending motions. The August 25, 2017 hearing on the application for reconsideration is VACATED. (Text Only Entry) (Schultz, C)

 

From:

State of Jefferson Patriots Nevada County
PO Box 1508 Penn Valley, CA 95946
530 316 4SOJ (4765)  SOJ51Patriots@gmail.com

 

Jefferson supporters argue the few representatives for northern counties violates citizens’ rights.
“The lobbyists and the unions own California and we intend to put the people back in charge of the government through smaller districts where it is cheap and easy to get rid of an incumbent who fails to serve the people. California has the worst representation ratio in the United States and we will prove that to be unconstitutional,” says Baird.

Cancelled   Friday Aug 25   

Stop everyone from coming on August 25th – date has been cancelled by the court per below. Get this info to everyone you know may be coming.

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Upon consideration of the parties’ filings relating to the question of whether a three judge court need be convened to resolve defendant’s pending motion to dismiss and plaintiffs’ pending motion to amend, the court has determined that it is premature to request the convening of such a court prior to this court’s threshold determination of jurisdiction and justiciability. See Shapiro v. McManus, 136 S. Ct. 450, 455 (2015). Defendant’s ex parte application for reconsideration (ECF [15]) is granted to the extent the direction to the Clerk of the Court at ECF 14 is WITHDRAWN until the court has resolved the pending motions. The August 25, 2017 hearing on the application for reconsideration is VACATED. (Text Only Entry) (Schultz, C)    

  But It’s Ok, says the State, becuz no one has adequate representation

 

 

  • website:cjsings071.wixsite.com/sojnc

  • For the latest resources and information on the movement of the State of Jefferson visit SOJ51.org

  • Do you have questions – visit

    Sign Up for the SOJ Messenger   (where the answers live)

  • KrisAnne Hall    “Liberty over Security,
    Principles over Party and Truth over Popularity”

No Comments

Some Northern California Residents File Suit Against State Gov’t, Say They’re Not Fairly Represented

JEFFERSON DECLARATION, Jefferson lawsuit

FOX 40 News

Andy White and his dad drove down to the state Capitol from far Sierra County on Monday to talk to their state senator. Instead, they met an aid.

The men are not surprised. They say they get that a lot — no response to phone calls or emails.

“We’ve sent quite a few, and we’ve come to the point where we had to file a lawsuit against the state of California,” said Sierra County resident Andy White.

Along with Californians from 21 other northern, rural counties, the men have sued claiming they are not fairly represented in the state’s government. Eleven of those counties are represented by one senator. Los Angeles County alone is represented by 11 senators.

“The legislation being passed down here, it’s run amok. It’s run amok. It’s a one-sided deal,” White said.

But what these men really want isn’t better representation in the state of California, they want to leave California and form a new state — the state of Jefferson.

“Okay, well, the state of Jefferson is very simple. California is too big to be governed. It’s just too big,” White said.

New gas taxes, new cigarette taxes, transgender bathroom law — these separatists say what may be a good idea for metropolitan California, doesn’t work in the northern counties. So they want to form their own state, and the lawsuit is likely part of their strategy.

“We want to add a star to the flag,” White said.

And if they can get the courts to agree that they are under represented now… the idea of the state of Jefferson will get that much closer to the main stream.

Some Northern California Residents File Suit Against State Gov’t, Say They’re Not Fairly Represented

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

No Comments