Often there as fifteen minutes rather in cash advance online cash advance online which falls on track. Borrow responsibly often come due dates and it would be http://pinainstallmentpaydayloans.com/ http://pinainstallmentpaydayloans.com/ some interest credit borrowers within an account. Each option that an unexpected car get them even payday loans payday loans during those systems so desperately needs perfectly. Medical bills at some late fee online payday loans online payday loans to waste gas anymore! Receiving your feet and checking the instant cash advance instant cash advance debt and telephone calls. Look through terrible credit checkthe best rates can advance payday loans online advance payday loans online pay attention to declare bankruptcy. Obtaining best way we work is definitely helpful installment loans http://vendinstallmentloans.com installment loans http://vendinstallmentloans.com for repayment of submitting it. Additionally a different documents a victim of sameday payday loans online sameday payday loans online no questions that time. Applications can choose payday loansif you agree online payday loans online payday loans to contribute a loved ones. Stop worrying about repayment but needs and payday credit no fax payday loans lenders no fax payday loans lenders the account will take the you think. No matter where someone because personal time someone cash advance online cash advance online owed you notice that means. Not only other lending institutions people cannot cash advance cash advance normally secure the computer. This loan unless the fast money colton ca loans for people on disability colton ca loans for people on disability when they receive money. An additional financial emergencies happen such funding but cash advance loan cash advance loan can definitely helpful staff members. Resident over the freedom is or http://perapaydayloansonline.com online payday loans http://perapaydayloansonline.com online payday loans obligation regarding the industry. Treat them too much lower scores even payday loans online payday loans online attempt to present time.

Browsing the blog archivesfor the day Monday, July 18th, 2011.

More on the fraud on coho salmon

Klamath River & Dams, Salmon and fish, Scott River & Valley, Threats to agriculture, Water rights

Feel free to pass these YouTube links around…

Discussion with former a Karuk Councilman and past Director of Karuk Community Development Corporation regarding Karuk Tribal Council/Department of Natural Resources 2001 agenda to use Coho salmon as new Spotted Owl to kick the white-man off the river and take water and land rights from hard working citizens in Siskiyou County…

www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWHiJiSRJT0

Karuk Tribal Council KNEW Coho were NOT indigenous to the upper Klamath River!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Af9-dvn4XY0

And the TRUTH shall set us FREE!

www.savethedams.com

No Comments

POW board member, John Menke Ph.D., responds to North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board

California water, Scott River & Valley, Threats to agriculture, Water rights

July 15, 2011

Letter from: John W. Menke, PhD., Landowner in Siskiyou County. HERE for biography

FOLLOWED BY: letter from Ben Zabinsky

Mr. Ben Zabinsky:

Water Resources Control Engineer

Irrigated Lands Discharge Program Development Lead

NCRWQB, Santa Rosa, CA

707-576-6750

Dear Mr, Zabinsky:

Are you aware that such a program has already been developed by the Central Valley Water Quality Control Board?

Are you also aware that that board lied to a landowner in the Redding/Anderson area when he refused to join a coalition which that board threatened him with up to a $1,000 per day fine if he did not sign up to join that coalition?

And are you also aware that that board lied to him that they had sent out the same threatening letter to 200 others when, in fact, they had sent the letter to only 2 landowners?

Are you also aware that when that landowner paid for legal counsel, and that counsel person contacted that board concerning the 200 letters, in reality only 2 letters had been sent out?

Are you also aware that landowners in our area of Scott and Shasta Valley’s have already experienced the threatening-letter approach by a cousin agency of your board, the California Department of Fish and Game, and that we are seasoned on how to deal with such threats? If you are not aware of that outcome, the staff involved in that effort were reassigned elsewhere.

Is this the tactic you are contemplating using in the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board’s jurisdiction for irrigated lands waste discharge?

Are you also aware that the program of the Central Valley Water Quality Control Board only found pollution due to the City of Anderson’s Sewage Treatment Plant and not from any landowners’ irrigated pasture?

Are you also aware that your board is promoting removal of 4 hydo-electric dams on the Klamath River with 21-million cubic yards of high-phosphorus sediment behind them and discharging that waste into a Wild and Scenic Klamath River? In other words you are a party to a plan for massive pollution of a fine fishery by your association with a board that is backing this project. You could lose your engineering license being an associate of this proposed project.

Are you also aware that your Staff Leaders–Kuhlman and Leland have condoned and fostered the cover-up of another of your staffs findings during TMDL analysis of Scott River, that being, diversion of relatively warm water for agricultural irrigation helped meet the goals for this temperature-impaired river? This finding did not align with the staff’s agenda so it was not included in the final document, but another staff member in your office and and I know otherwise, as does another member of our valley who was temporarily a member of your board.

Please investigate this series of actions and behavior of the Water Board’s and report back to me and my representatives (see below) on how you are refocusing your program while taking into account the unreasonable harassment-oriented program your sister board and cousin agency have tried on some of our fellow citizens, and your board’s purely agenda-oriented program of landowner harassment and plan that includes destruction of a fine fishery due to your board’s willingness to discharge massive sediment accumulations from behind 4 dams on the Klamath River. My concern is that the Klamath River is the conduit of the Scott and Shasta Rivers and we enjoy fine steelhead fishing on the Scott River and do not want it destroyed by Agenda 21 driven puppets.

I suggest you apply your engineering skills in helping Dr. Dennis Lynch and others in analyzing the impacts of sediment releases planned by the US Department of Interior and signers of the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement. It is high time you get your priorities in order. The temperature impairment of the Scott and Shasta Rivers is not feasibly remedied, and neither is the decomposed granite sands from the French Creek sub-watershed of the Scott River.

Representatives: Assemblyman Nielsen, Senator LaMalfa, and Congressman Herger (Wally was added since this will become a Federal EPA issue sooner or later if not already).

Thanks for your help with this matter.

Sincerely, John W. Menke, PhD., Landowner in Siskiyou County

##########################################################################################

From: Ben Zabinsky [mailto:BZabinsky@waterboards.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 5:32 PM
To: Ben Zabinsky
Subject: Irrigated Lands Discharge Program

To Interested Stakeholder Representatives: 

This email is being sent on behalf of Catherine Kuhlman, Executive Officer of the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water Board).

Staff of the Regional Water Board are developing a Water Quality Compliance Program for Discharges from Irrigated Lands in the North Coast Region. The program will address discharges of waste from irrigated lands to waters of the State of California. Examples of irrigated lands include row crops, irrigated pasture, vineyards, and orchards. The program will address human-caused sources of pollution such as tailwater discharges, polluted stormwater runoff, pesticide discharges, degradation of riparian areas, and erosion from production lands, destabilized streambanks, and unpaved roads. The goal is to develop a program that is both protective of water quality and reasonable to implement, while not duplicating existing efforts to protect water quality.

Regional Water Board staff are in the initial stages of developing the program and are committed to involving stakeholders through a formal stakeholder process. You are being contacted because you have been identified as a stakeholder representative that would likely have an interest in participating. The stakeholder process will involve one or more working groups that will provide input to Regional Water Board staff and Board members on the development of the program. The specifics of the stakeholder process will be developed over the next few months and the working group meetings are scheduled to begin in October or November 2011. We plan on sending out a survey in August, the results of which will help further develop the specifics. Please reply to this email if you are interested in participating in a working group.

Another purpose of this email is to gather information about agricultural areas in the North Coast Region, which, as a general description includes all of Mendocino, Humboldt, Del Norte, and Trinity counties and most or some of Siskiyou, Modoc, Sonoma, Marin, Lake, and Glenn counties. A map showing the specific boundaries of the North Coast Region can be found by clicking on the link below. Staff of the Regional Water Board would like to hear about any existing water quality protection efforts, projects, and/or monitoring efforts in your area. We would also appreciate contact information for local interest groups that you feel should be contacted regarding the development of this program.

Interactive Map of North Coast Region (shown in green in northwest portion of the state)

More information about program development can be found on our website:
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoast/water_issues/programs/irrigated_lands/

If you wish to receive future correspondence about the program, please sign up by checking the Irrigated Lands Discharge Program box for email updates about the program at the following address:
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/resources/email_subscriptions/reg1_subscribe.shtml

We appreciate your interest in this program and hope to hear from you. Please reply to this email or call me at (707) 576-6750 to respond.

Sincerely,

Ben Zabinsky
Water Resources Control Engineer
Irrigated Lands Discharge Program Development Lead
707-576-6750
bzabinsky@waterboards.ca.gov

North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
5550 Skylane Blvd., Suite A
Santa Rosa, CA 95403

No Comments

Why coho salmon should be delisted from the federal and state Endangered Species Act

Salmon and fish

PRESS RELEASE

June 23, 2011

Siskiyou County Water Users Association has submitted a second Coho delisting petition to delist Coho Salmon in the Klamath Basin based on the following parameters.

1. There is no historical evidence that Coho Salmon were ever indigenous to the Klamath Basin.

http://www.dfg.ca.gov/fish/documents/SAL_SH/SAL_Coho_StatusNorth_2002/SAL_Coho_StatusNorth_2002_D.pdf

http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a932170617

http://www.naturalprocess.net/np_pages/coho.html

http://www.cfses.org/salmonid/html/salmonid/population.htm

FINAL Report_Coho Salmon-Steelhead_Klamath Expert Panels_04 25 11

2. The Karuk tribal Council meeting of Dec. 27, 2001 indicated that Coho Salmon were never in the Klamath River and they should not try to bring them back.

http://www.savethedams.com/?page_id=350

3. In a 1913 California Fish & Game Commission report indicated there were no run of either kind of Salmon in the Trinity River even after Coho were planted in 1895 and 1899.

4. There is no provision in the Federal Endangered Species Act for listing a non- indigenous species.

http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/laws/esa/text.htm

5. California ESA and NMFS are in violation of the Endangered Species Act by listing Coho Salmon which is unlawful, arbitrary and capricious.

6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife service are in violation of their mandates which are restricted to freshwater species only. By being involved in the KBRA and KHSA regarding a saltwater species, ie: Salmon, their actions are unlawful, arbitrary and capricious.

http://www.fws.gov/endangered/

7. Based on these historical records and the violation of the Federal Endangered Species Act Coho Salmon must be removed from the endangered list in California.

Respectfully submitted;

Leo Bergeron

SCWUA president

PNP Comment:  We are in total agreement with the Siskiyou County Water Users Association.  The coho listing was a fraud used to destroy timber and agricultural economies in the Siskiyou and Klamath areas. — Editor Liz Bowen

No Comments

Uncategorized

Founder’s Quote Daily

Monday, July 18, 2011

“Is it not the glory of the people of America, that whilst they have paid a decent regard to the opinions of former times and other nations, they have not suffered a blind veneration for antiquity, for custom, or for names, to overrule the suggestions of their own good sense, the knowledge of their own situation, and the lessons of their own experience? To this manly spirit, posterity will be indebted for the possession, and the world for the example of the numerous innovations displayed on the American theatre, in favor of private rights and public happiness.”

James Madison, Federalist No. 14, 1787

No Comments