Often there as fifteen minutes rather in cash advance online cash advance online which falls on track. Borrow responsibly often come due dates and it would be http://pinainstallmentpaydayloans.com/ http://pinainstallmentpaydayloans.com/ some interest credit borrowers within an account. Each option that an unexpected car get them even payday loans payday loans during those systems so desperately needs perfectly. Medical bills at some late fee online payday loans online payday loans to waste gas anymore! Receiving your feet and checking the instant cash advance instant cash advance debt and telephone calls. Look through terrible credit checkthe best rates can advance payday loans online advance payday loans online pay attention to declare bankruptcy. Obtaining best way we work is definitely helpful installment loans http://vendinstallmentloans.com installment loans http://vendinstallmentloans.com for repayment of submitting it. Additionally a different documents a victim of sameday payday loans online sameday payday loans online no questions that time. Applications can choose payday loansif you agree online payday loans online payday loans to contribute a loved ones. Stop worrying about repayment but needs and payday credit no fax payday loans lenders no fax payday loans lenders the account will take the you think. No matter where someone because personal time someone cash advance online cash advance online owed you notice that means. Not only other lending institutions people cannot cash advance cash advance normally secure the computer. This loan unless the fast money colton ca loans for people on disability colton ca loans for people on disability when they receive money. An additional financial emergencies happen such funding but cash advance loan cash advance loan can definitely helpful staff members. Resident over the freedom is or http://perapaydayloansonline.com online payday loans http://perapaydayloansonline.com online payday loans obligation regarding the industry. Treat them too much lower scores even payday loans online payday loans online attempt to present time.

Browsing the blog archives for September, 2014.

Water rationing hits California: limit of 50 gallons per person per day or face fines of $500

CA & OR, State gov, Water, Resources & Quality

(NaturalNews)

Millions of Californians are about to be hit with strict water rationing — daily “allocation” numbers that represent the maximum amount of water you’re allowed to use for any purpose. Households that exceed the allocation limit will face stiff fines of hundreds of dollars per violation.

“In July, the State Water Resources Control Board passed stage one emergency regulations, giving powers to all local water agencies to fine $500 per violation,” reports the San Gabriel Valley Tribune. [1]

Keep in mind that these are only “stage one” emergency regulations. Stages two and three have yet to be invoked and will only become more severe.

The amount of water each household is allowed by water districts will be determined by government employees viewing satellite imagery of private properties, then calculating how much water that property should be allowed to use.

“Using census records, aerial photography and satellite imagery, an agency can determine a property’s efficient water usage,” says the SGVT.

50 gallons per person, per day

In some districts, water rationing allocation is also based on the number of persons who are known to be living at each address based on U.S. Census data. The Irvine Ranch Water District allows 50 gallons of “indoor” water consumption per person in the home. As explained on the IRWD website: [3]

The indoor water allocation is 50 gallons per person per day and depends upon the number of residents in a home. Water allocated for landscape irrigation depends upon the type of home.

As the IRWD website explains, those water consumers who the government deems to be “wasteful” will be charged 160% or higher rates for water consumption. This is on top of the $500 fines for each violation, as has now been approved by the state.

The 50 gallons per person per day is the maximum allocated amount for all indoor water use, including laundry, showering, toilet flushing, drinking, washing dishes and hand washing for hygienic purposes.

According to the EPA, the average U.S. citizen currently uses 100 gallons per day, with 70 of those gallons consumed indoors. [4] The largest users of indoor water are toilets, showers and clothes washers.

Not yet called “rationing” because the word isn’t socially acceptable

Interestingly, the water rationing that’s about to be enforced in California isn’t being called rationing. Instead, California’s doublespeak wordsmiths have decided to call it an “allocation-based rate structure” (which simply means that after you hit your ration limit, you are harshly penalized for any additional consumption).

In explaining why California citizens will be heavily penalized with fines if they exceed their water rationing allocation, all sorts of elaborate doublespeak terms are now being used such as “strong price signals” and “conservation response.”

Here’s how the IRWD explains water rationing to its customers without using the term “rationing“:

Allocation-based rate structures are the foundation of IRWD’s Water Shortage Contingency Plan. This rate structure allows IRWD to quickly respond to limited supplies through strong price signals, which result in the greatest conservation response from our customers.

Translation: If we aggressively penalize people for exceeding their water allocation, they will seek to stay within the limits for the same reason that people try to avoid speeding tickets — nobody wants to pay the fines!

Landscape watering limited to two days a week

Some California water districts are also enforcing unprecedented restrictions on water use for “outdoor watering” applications.

The Irvine Ranch Water District, for example, has publicly announced its intention to “…implement mandatory outdoor water use restrictions that restrict outdoor watering to two days a week.” [2]

Lots more at below link —
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/047061_water_rationing_california_drought.html#ixzz3EpbpbIGb

No Comments

Dahle utility bill signed into law

Assemblyman Brian Dahle, State gov

AB 2363 protects ratepayers, levels playing field for biomass, geothermal power

A measure sponsored by Assemblyman Brian Dahle requiring utility regulators to calculate the full cost of reliably integrating renewable energy into the state’s power grid has won the governor’s signature.

Assembly Bill 2363 directs the California Public Utilities Commission to calculate the integration cost of different sources of “green” power to ensure ratepayers get the best deal for their renewable electricity dollar.

“California has the nation’s most aggressive plans to promote renewable energy,” Dahle said. “As we push ahead, we need to protect ratepayers and be fair to businesses that have invested in renewable generation.”

Wind and solar electricity, in particular, require expensive backup power or storage to ensure consistent availability of electricity despite changes in the weather, yet the CPUC has not included those costs when figuring the cost of renewable energy sources as it reviews utilities’ power purchases.

A better accounting will level the playing field within the renewable sector and ensure small hydroelectric, geothermal, and biomass energy producers have a fair shot at selling power into the market. Large tax credits and other incentives for wind and solar have undermined the financial viability of some of the North State’s most valuable contributions to the state’s renewable-energy future.

“In order to ensure the security and stability of California’s energy market, our renewable portfolio standards need to be balanced and diversified,” said Julee Malinowski Ball, Executive Director of the California Biomass Energy Alliance. “Assemblyman Dahle’s AB 2363 is a significant move in that direction by requiring the Public Utilities Commission to accurately consider the full costs and benefits of renewable resources being offered.”

“On behalf of Calpine and the over 300 men and women who work full-time at The Geysers, the world’s single largest geothermal resource developed for electric generation, we want to thank Assemblymember Brian Dahle for his tenacious support of a renewable energy policy that creates a more level playing field among all new and existing renewable resources in the utility contracting process,” said Jim Kluesener, Calpine’s Vice President of Geothermal Operations. “The Geysers has been in operation for nearly 55 years and we look forward to continuing to work with Assemblymember Dahle, members of the State Legislature, Governor Brown and the California Public Utilities Commission to implement this important piece of legislation and other policies necessary to ensure The Geysers continue to provide affordable and reliable low-carbon energy for years to come.”

The measure will also protect ratepayers. AB 2363 will help ensure utilities buy power that meets customers’ needs at the true best price, instead of hiding the long-term costs of new renewable power sources.

In signing AB 2363, Gov. Jerry Brown issued a statement stressing the need to maintain affordability and reliability, and noting the importance of geothermal and biomass power in meeting the state’s environmental goals.

“I thank the Governor for signing this bill,” Dahle said, “and it’s encouraging that we share a similar, bipartisan vision for these important North State industries.”

Assemblyman Brian Dahle, R-Bieber, represents the 1st Assembly District, which includes Shasta, Lassen, Nevada, Siskiyou, Modoc, Plumas and Sierra counties, and portions of Butte and Placer counties.

###

No Comments

Biologists identify pot gardens as salmon threat

Federal gov & land grabs, Greenies & grant $, Salmon and fish, Water, Resources & Quality, Wildlife

PNP comment: About time the pollution and water takings by marijuana growers in the public’s land is exposed. — Editor Liz Bowen

Published: Tuesday, Sep. 30, 2014 – 9:33 am

Last Modified: Tuesday, Sep. 30, 2014 – 10:31 am

Water use and other actions by the marijuana industry in the Emerald Triangle of Northern California and Southern Oregon are threatening salmon already in danger of extinction, federal biologists said Tuesday.

Concerns about the impact of pot farming were raised by the NOAA Fisheries Service in its final recovery plan for coho salmon in the region. The full plan was to be posted on the agency’s website.

A copy obtained in advance calls for determining then decreasing the amount of water that pot growers illegally withdraw from creeks where young fish struggle to survive.

Pot is legally grown in the region for medical purposes and illegally for the black market.

Other threats from the unregulated industry include clear-cutting forests to create pot plantations, building roads that send sediment into salmon streams, and spreading fertilizer and pesticides that poison the water.

Coho salmon have been listed as a threatened species since 1997 in the region. Like salmon throughout the West, they have suffered from loss of habitat from logging, agriculture, urban development, overfishing and dams.

The recovery plan also calls for steps to address many of those issues.

The spotlight on marijuana stemmed from a California Department of Fish and Wildlife study that estimated pot growers suck millions of gallons of water from salmon streams.

“Logging is regulated. Vineyards are regulated. It is time this industry was willing to be regulated,” said Scott Bauer, an environmental scientist on the watershed enforcement team of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and lead author of the study.

Armed with new authority from the Legislature, the department is imposing fines for illegal water withdrawals for use on pot plantations, Bauer said.

The recovery plan points specifically to marijuana as a threat in river basins of Northern California, but the same issues exist in southwestern Oregon rivers, said Clarence Hostler, south coast branch chief for NOAA Fisheries in Arcata, California.

The plan marks the second time that Endangered Species Act actions have pointed to marijuana as a threat. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been looking at rat poison left around illegal pot plantations in California as a factor in whether to list the Pacific fisher as a threatened species.

The Emerald Growers Association represents a few hundred marijuana farmers in the region known as the Emerald Triangle due to the prevalence of pot plantations. Executive director Hezekiah Allen said bringing the industry under regulation would allow legitimate growers to compete more evenly with illegal growers, who have a financial incentive to cut corners.

“We need regulation that’s going to make sense to the farmers on the ground,” he said. “That is also going to achieve the public safety and environmental goals that we all share.”

http://www.sacbee.com/2014/09/30/6748361/biologists-identify-pot-gardens.html

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2014/09/30/6748361/biologists-identify-pot-gardens.html#storylink=cpy
No Comments

California plastic bag ban signed, setting off sweeping changes

CA & OR, State gov

SacBee.com

Published: Tuesday, Sep. 30, 2014 – 10:04 am

Last Modified: Tuesday, Sep. 30, 2014 – 11:52 am

Time to invest in a reusable shopping bag.

Concluding the long odyssey of one of the most contentious bills of 2014, Gov. Jerry Brown on Tuesday signed legislation phasing out the single-use plastic bags that grocery stores and other retailers use to package products at the checkout line. Brown’s assent hands a sweeping victory to environmentalists and vindicates the scores of cities and counties that have already banned bags.

“This bill is a step in the right direction – it reduces the torrent of plastic polluting our beaches, parks and even the vast ocean itself,” Brown wrote in a signing message. “We’re the first to ban these bags, and we won’t be the last.”

Minutes after Brown announced signing the bill, an industry group called the American Progressive Bag Alliance vowed to begin collecting signatures in an effort to overturn the law via a referendum on the 2016 ballot.

“Our research confirms that the vast majority of California voters are opposed to legislation that bans recyclable plastic bags and allows grocers to charge and keep fees on other bags,” a release from the organization said, denouncing the legislation as “a back room deal between the grocers and union bosses to scam California consumers out of billions of dollars without providing any public benefit – all under the guise of environmentalism.”

Implementing the law will reverberate through multiple industries, shifting how retailers and manufacturers do business. Consumers will face a choice: purchase a reusable bag, or pay at least ten cents for a paper bag or a multi-use plastic carrier that meets a set of state durability standards.

It is not a new concept. There is precedent in the more than 100 municipalities across the state that have already enacted similar prohibitions after concluding that the amount of waste generated by plastic bags outweighs the convenience. Advocates for a statewide ban said the experiment has unfolded on the local level with few hitches.

“There has been very little in the way of noncompliance with the local ordinances – grocery stores seem to be complying readily,” said Mark Murray, executive director of Californians Against Waste, which spearheaded the state legislation. “There has been zero need for plastic bag police.”

Senate Bill 270 authorizes local governments to impose fines of up to $5,000 on businesses that don’t ditch their single-use bags or fail to charge for substitutes. But in San Francisco, where California’s first bag ban has been extended to cover businesses large and small, a spokesman said the city has not leveled a single fine.

“The idea for us was really to change behavior,” said San Francisco Department of the Environment spokesman Guillermo Rodriguez, pointing to a campaign that included preparing explanations of the new law merchants could post in their stores. “We felt the education and outreach has been the primary vehicle.”

Davis is one of the most recent adherents, adopting a ban this summer. The manager of Nugget Market on Mace Boulevard said the transition has been painless.

“It’s pretty seamless, I would say,” manager Vicente Osegueda said. “There’s always a little bit of a reaction when something’s different, but most (customers) really understand why they were taken out.”

That lack of consternation reflects the fact that organizations representing retailers and grocery stores backed SB 270, calling a statewide standard preferable to the current quilt of varying ordinances.

Opposition came from other quarters. Critics representing paper and plastic bag businesses denounced the minimum ten-cent fee as an unjustified sweetener included to buy the backing of grocery stores.

Lawmakers who voted against the bill called the ten cent fee a hidden wealth transfer tax that would enrich a powerful industry while burdening low-income Californians, confusing consumers and damaging the economy.

http://www.sacbee.com/2014/09/30/6748372/california-plastic-bag-ban-signed.html

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2014/09/30/6748372/california-plastic-bag-ban-signed.html#storylink=cpy
No Comments

Call Guv. Brown today asking for “VETO” on anti-gun legislative bills

2nd Amendment, 2nd Amendment rights, CA & OR, Constitution, CORRUPTION, State gov

~URGENT~
Last day to call, tweet and email Gov. Jerry Brown to VETO these Unconstitutional GUN BILLS. If he does not veto them today, the bills will automatically become law!
SB808 – . Bans the sale, transfer, and inheritance of home-built firearms. Requires you to PERMANENTLY DEFACE all un-serialized handguns, and all long guns made after December 16, 1968, with a DOJ-issued serial number — EVEN IF CURRENTLY LEGAL.
AB1014 – Creates “Gun Violence Restraining Orders” and “firearm seizure warrants” to strip people of Second Amendment rights and their property.
AB1609 – New firearm importation regulations, penalties.
SB199 – Redefines BB guns/imitation firearms, adds new manufacturing requirements.

Phone: (916) 445-2841

Twitter: @JerryBrownGov

Today is the LAST day to defend your Second Amendment gun rights.

No Comments

News from Klamath Basin Crisis.org 9-29-14

Klamath Basin Crisis.org

KBC News

Proverbs 2:6-9 “For the Lord gives wisdom; from His mouth come knowledge and understanding; He stores up sound wisdom for the upright; He is a shield to those who walk uprightly; He guards the paths of justice, and preserves the way of His saints. Then you will understand righteousness and justice, equity and every good path.” Sent from Frank Tallerico 9/28/14

Getting to ‘yes’ in the Klamath Basin. Water issues prove divisive, both locally and on a national level, Congressman Greg Walden for H&N 9/28/14. “The public — the hardworking families of the Klamath Basin — is too often left out of this debate, hampering progress towards the goal…Any effort to build public support must recognize that removing all four dams is a non-starter. Most people in the Basin oppose such a plan, as do key folks in Congress…”

Media may need permit to film nature; Forest Service considers setting fees for wilderness photography, movie-making, (comment period through Dec 3). H&N, posted to KBC 9/28/14. “(USFS) said it would consider the nature of a proposed project before approving a special-use permit and charge fees of up to $1,500 for commercial filming and photography in federally designated wilderness areas. Press advocates have criticized the rules as a violation of the First Amendment, saying it raises concerns about press freedom…The agency, which manages nearly 190 million acres of public lands in national forests and grasslands, including 439 wilderness areas…permit applications would be evaluated based on several criteria, including whether it spreads information about the enjoyment or use of wilderness or its ecological, geological, scientific, educational, scenic or historical values; helps preserve the wilderness character…’It is also very troubling that journalists could be held to different standards at the discretion of the issuing officer depending on the content of their stories and its relevance to wilderness activity,” U.S. Rep. Greg Walden’ “

Planning under way for Merrill Potato Festival Oct 16-18, H&N 9/28/14

Bucket holds strong symbolism for the (Klamath) Basin, by Jim Ottoman, H&N posted to KBC 9/28/14.

Bucket symbolizes key struggle in community by Rudy Hiley, Tulelake for H&N posted to KBC 9/28/14

California woman helps neighbors during drought; 72-year-old transports fresh water jugs to those in need, H&N posted to KBC 9/28/14.

While CAl Fish and Game WCB spends $30,000,000 in land acquisition.

Footing the bill for legislative loan is too heavy a burden for Oregonians; taxpayers should vote ‘no’ on Measure 86, by Oregon Senator Doug Whitsett for H&N posted to KBC 9/28/14. “…the principle and interest on state debt exceeds the entire budget for the Oregon Department of Corrections…”
Going for launch with the salmon cannon, H&N posted to KBC 9/28/14. “Salmon may soon have a faster way to make it around dams. There’s a new technology that’s helping to transport hatchery fish in Washington. It’s called the salmon cannon..”

State adopts drought rule; drinking, stock water given preference by commission, H&N posted to KBC 9/28/14. Related article: County, state tussle over water regulations; public works director to sit on water advisory, H&N, posted to KBC 9/20/14.

Energy independence is possible…it all starts at the ballot box, Oregon Senator Doug Whitsett newsletter in H&N posted to KBC 9/28/14.
www.klamathbasincrisis.org

No Comments

Guv. Brown Vetoes Bill Limiting Drone Surveillance

State gov

Brown Vetoes Bill Limiting Drone Surveillance

File photo of the Predator Drone (credit: General Atomics/Getty Images)

File photo of the Predator Drone (credit: General Atomics/Getty Images)

 CBS Sacramento

Get Breaking News First

Receive News, Politics, and Entertainment Headlines Each Morning.

Sign Up

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (CBS/AP) — Gov. Jerry Brown has vetoed a bill that would have placed strict limits on law enforcement agencies using unmanned aerial drones for surveillance.

The governor’s office announced that the bill was one of more than a dozen pieces of legislation he vetoed Sunday.

AB1327 by Republican Assemblyman Jeff Gorrell of Camarillo would have required government agencies to get warrants before conducting surveillance with drones and would have required that they publicly announce their intent to buy and use them.

It was passed by the Legislature in the last days of its session last month.

Brown said in a statement that the bill appears to be too narrow and could go beyond what the state and federal constitutions would prohibit.

“There are undoubtedly circumstances where a warrant is appropriate,” he wrote. “The bill’s exceptions, however, appear to be too narrow and could impose requirements beyond what is required by either the 4th Amendment or the privacy provisions in the California Constitution.”

(Copyright 2014 – The Associated Press contributed to this report. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/09/28/brown-vetoes-bill-limiting-drone-surveillance/

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

No Comments

Yreka Tea Party Patriots- no meeting this week

TEA Party

NO Meeting on this Tuesday, Sept. 30th

Instead you are encouraged to attend the 2 day

KrisAnn Hall Seminar on the Constitution

at the Yreka Greenhorn Grange .

– Free to the Public. Everyone Welcome.

Contact Louise for more information at 530-842-5443

No Comments

Forest Service Clarifies Photography Rules

Federal gov & land grabs, Forestry & USFS

Alaska Native News.com

The U.S. Forest Service has done an about-face on the issue of photography on U.S. Forest Service lands throughout the nation. Previously this week, it was reported that the U.S. Forest Service would be charging up to $1,500 for permits to film or take photographs in federally designated wilderness areas or face penalties of up to $1,000.

According to Acting Wilderness Director, Liz Close, previously, the restrictions have been in place and that the agency s implementing the Wilderness Act of 1964 and are needed to preserve the country’s wilderness.

The proposed regulation would have affected 109,000,000 acres of federally designated wilderness, half of which is in the state of Alaska. The Forest Service has said that a permit would not be required unless sets are brought in or models used in the shoot or where the public is generally not permitted.

On Thursday, upon learning of the Forest Service’s photography policy, Senator Mark Begich released the following statement:

“These proposed rules are ridiculous. It’s deeply troubling that the USFS is proposing to make Alaskans pay a ‘photo fee’ in the Tongass or Chugach — it’s absurd,” said Begich. “The rule also appears to defy common sense, as the cost to issue complete and process paperwork permits would likely far outweigh the revenue generated. I will be contacting U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Vilsack and USFS Chief Tidwell to re-consider this unnecessary rule that tramples on First Amendment rights. The bottom line is that Forest Service policy should protect the First Amendment and allow Alaskans to hunt, fish, hike or photograph our national forests unhindered.”

Late Thursday night, U.S.F.S. Chief Tom Tidwell released a statement stating that the provisions would not include news gathering footage or that of documentaries. Tidwell also stated, “The proposal does not change the rules for visitors or recreational photographers. Generally, professional and amateur photographers will not need a permit unless they use models, actors or props; work in areas where the public is generally not allowed; or cause additional administrative costs.”

In short, Tidwell said, “The fact is, the directive pertains to commercial photography and filming only – if you’re there to gather news or take recreational photographs, no permit would be required.”

http://alaska-native-news.com/forest-service-clarifies-photography-rules-13508

1 Comment

Northern California Sheriffs’ Conference 9-27-14

Sheriffs

Del Norte Sheriff Dean Wilson is hosting a Sheriffs’ Conference

Saturday, Sept. 27, 2014

1 to 4 p.m.

Veterans Memorial Hall

810 H Street

Crescent City, CA.

Panel of Sheriffs include:

Siskiyou Sheriff Jon Lopey

Modoc Sheriff Mike Poindexter

Glenn sheriff Larry Jones

Humboldt Sheriff Mike Downey

No Comments
« Older Posts